I dont understand why a lot of people compare mike to joe, they are 2 totally different fighters. i dont hate on frazier, in fact he's one of my favourite fighters but i dont see him getting past mike
frazier's only best weapon was the left hook, no jab, good right, but nothing flashy or special. Amazing conditioning, TOPS
Mike was a great puncher, much better hitter than joe. he showed his power against bigger men.
Mike is not given credit for his jab, when in fact he used to set up a lot of stuff with his jab, and outjabbed a 6'5 Tony Tucker who was a great boxer with a lot more reach
tyson could go to the body just as good as frazier did, and while mike's stamina might not have been equal to joes', he didnt tire early and was always on the attack
also while some may point out that their defense was similar, i disagree completely. Mike used to bob and weave side to side, while joe was all over the place, and moving his head forward, in other words open to uppercuts
aside from foreman joe havent been in there with harder punchers. Oscar Bonavena was a pretty good and awkward puncher, but no where close to what foreman or tyson were. and oscar dropped frazier twice in their first fight. Bob foster was a great left hooker, but while he may have been taller and longer, he was a smaller man, and the fight ended after 2 rounds.
i see tysona catching joe at any point with an uppecut or any other hard punch, and i see joe getting in trouble. And tyson was a great finisher.
the only thing that might make a difference in this fight is Joe's will and determination
Agree or Disagree?
frazier's only best weapon was the left hook, no jab, good right, but nothing flashy or special. Amazing conditioning, TOPS
Mike was a great puncher, much better hitter than joe. he showed his power against bigger men.
Mike is not given credit for his jab, when in fact he used to set up a lot of stuff with his jab, and outjabbed a 6'5 Tony Tucker who was a great boxer with a lot more reach
tyson could go to the body just as good as frazier did, and while mike's stamina might not have been equal to joes', he didnt tire early and was always on the attack
also while some may point out that their defense was similar, i disagree completely. Mike used to bob and weave side to side, while joe was all over the place, and moving his head forward, in other words open to uppercuts
aside from foreman joe havent been in there with harder punchers. Oscar Bonavena was a pretty good and awkward puncher, but no where close to what foreman or tyson were. and oscar dropped frazier twice in their first fight. Bob foster was a great left hooker, but while he may have been taller and longer, he was a smaller man, and the fight ended after 2 rounds.
i see tysona catching joe at any point with an uppecut or any other hard punch, and i see joe getting in trouble. And tyson was a great finisher.
the only thing that might make a difference in this fight is Joe's will and determination
Agree or Disagree?
Comment