Originally posted by brownpimp88
View Post
1. Walcott's chin was just as good or bad as Bowe's, at the very least as evidenced by Bowe's avoidance of any big punching opposisiton. Bowe had no defence of which to speak as evidenced by his consistantly eating close to 60% of the punches thrown his way.
2. So, you're telling me a man can do just as good fighting on one week's or less notice as if he'd had an appropriate time to train and get in shape? Bowe could have beaten Holyfield in 1992 if he found out about the fight one week prior?
3. Why are you specifiying "someone he didn't lose to"? Doesn't it say something about a man/fighter if he can improve his game plan, learn from his mistakes and come back to win. I'd think, you being a Holyfield fan, that would count for something.....'cause using that standard, post-prison Tyson is the only win he ever had that really counts. No Bowe, No Moorer....tough call on your part.
...you have to have equal standards to judge equally, otherwise you must make allowances.
Comment