AMAZING 2nd ********* speech by Green Beret combat vet causes ******** walkout

[man down]

Thats old ain't it.

But he lost me early on with all the boring D vs R nonsense. CA one of the states who've taken more gun control measures, and from the sounds of it post-election will be making more of them, has seen a drop of 50%ish on gun violence.

Its beyond ******ed to me ANYONE thinks allowing less guns in peoples hands won't reduce the amount of gun deaths. Thats just math sh^t. Can't argue too hard against f#cking math unless you flunked 3rd grade level math. Don't even need algebra for this math problem. Less ******s or crazy mfers having guns = less dead people.

You know we have more guns now than ever right? Murder rates are trending down. 33 year low. Man the media can make things feel different huh?

[The Big Dunn]

I just wish mass shooters would shoot up only the places where gun advocates live, work, socialize and send their children.

That way the "pro 2nd *********" people can debate whether we need more or less gun control at the funerals of their friends and loved ones while the rest of us live our lives.

[TripleJ]

I just wish mass shooters would shoot up only the places where gun advocates live, work, socialize and send their children.

That way the "pro 2nd *********" people can debate whether we need more or less gun control at the funerals of their friends and loved ones while the rest of us live our lives.

I also wish that. A lot of these concealed carry fellas would end the night real quick like. Mass shooters should be limited to attacking police stations, gun shows, shooting ranges and gun stores. See how those stats change instead of vs soft targets.

[man down]

I just wish mass shooters would shoot up only the places where gun advocates live, work, socialize and send their children.

That way the "pro 2nd *********" people can debate whether we need more or less gun control at the funerals of their friends and loved ones while the rest of us live our lives.

Yes because mass shooting is such a large percentage of shootings. We should get right on that!

[The Big Dunn]

Yes because mass shooting is such a large percentage of shootings. We should get right on that!

I know you don't care about the issue and use statistics to try and minimize events that should never occur and have been addressed in other countries the 1st time they happen.

I don't agree with your position on this issue but I don't see why you'd have an issue with my suggestion.

You and I guess 200 million people can occupy as large a portion of the US as you wish. When a mass shooter goes bezerk, you and those like you can shoot back. You can all start shooting. Of course there will be 1,000 dead instead of 60.

The best part, those of us that want more gun control are not harmed. It's a win-win in my book.

[man down]

I know you don't care about the issue and use statistics to try and minimize events that should never occur and have been addressed in other countries the 1st time they happen.

I don't agree with your position on this issue but I don't see why you'd have an issue with my suggestion.

You and I guess 200 million people can occupy as large a portion of the US as you wish. When a mass shooter goes bezerk, you and those like you can shoot back. You can all start shooting. Of course there will be 1,000 dead instead of 60.

The best part, those of us that want more gun control are not harmed. It's a win-win in my book.

What's your idea of gun control what do you suggest it's not already being done

[The Big Dunn]

What's your idea of gun control what do you suggest it's not already being done

My suggestion is what I posted-all of you live together and shoot each other up. So long as those of us that want more gun control are not affected.

You don't think it's an issue that warrants a solution. Ok. I look at the steps other countries have taken after 1 event and know we could do something to reduce the occurrence, even if that occurrence is rare.

[man down]

My suggestion is what I posted-all of you live together and shoot each other up. So long as those of us that want more gun control are not affected.

You don't think it's an issue that warrants a solution. Ok. I look at the steps other countries have taken after 1 event and know we could do something to reduce the occurrence, even if that occurrence is rare.

So you don't want to give a real answer. I wonder why that is

[TripleJ]

My suggestion is what I posted-all of you live together and shoot each other up. So long as those of us that want more gun control are not affected.

You don't think it's an issue that warrants a solution. Ok. I look at the steps other countries have taken after 1 event and know we could do something to reduce the occurrence, even if that occurrence is rare.

Ok, I'm just curious here. Lets say we do the Australia route, guns are illegal, hand them in. Law abiding citizens are now unarmed. For your theory, lets even say it completely stops mass shootings. Do you think the majority types of gun crime in general will go up or down where it's already prevelant now that the public is unarmed vs armed criminals? We're not talking australia level gun activity with criminals here.... is it worth stopping the one to kill the hundred as a result?

[man down]

Ok, I'm just curious here. Lets say we do the Australia route, guns are illegal, hand them in. Law abiding citizens are now unarmed. For your theory, lets even say it completely stops mass shootings. Do you think the majority types of gun crime in general will go up or down where it's already prevelant now that the public is unarmed vs armed criminals? We're not talking australia level gun activity with criminals here.... is it worth stopping the one to kill the hundred as a result?

I really don't understand the confiscation thing anyway 2nd ********* isn't going away. So if that's the case then what's a real answer what are laws that you would like to see on the books that are not on the books already?

Australia also never had it 400 million + guns in the country to confiscate.