Originally posted by Elroy The Great
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does the U.S. of A belong to Caucasians?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostYou don't think that was done strategically via policy and white supremacy or you think it's like that because whites have always just been that much superior?
The reason you focus so much on whites is because you scapegoat them in order to explain the exceptional failure of your own group.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by //// View PostWhy single out whites?
Secondly, starting in the 15th/16th centuries, whites were the beneficiaries of many of their own policies. Fast forward to the 21st century
All but a small handful of ethnic groups who have come to the US have thrived with ease
The reason you focus so much on whites is because you scapegoat them in order to explain the exceptional failure of your own group
Do I seriously need to make a comparison of modern day immigrants to the history of AA's with all the policies and intentions included to make sure AA's were a permanent underclass?
Comment
-
as in most things, there is a superior race. just like there are superior athletes and works of art, there are superior races.
if the american indian was a superior race, they wouldnt have been decimated and on the brink of extinction (6.6 mil out of 325,089,365 as of 2017, including those in alaska).
even the most vile and evil white person is ''superior'' to similar cvnts from other races. hitler is the babe ruth of evil fncks and he started out as a mediocre painter.
caucasians also have the most individuals on the ''greatest rulers/conquerors of all time'' list and it isnt even close.
blacks seem to have athletic superiority in certain sports (nba, boxing, nfl, track/field)
whites and latins do well in mlb and kick ball.
whites also seem to own hockey, tennis and water sports.
to deny this is silly.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment