Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

At Least 150 Blacks Attacked Whites at Random Around Temple University

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BERNIE'S CORNER View Post
    And here are a few paragraphs from the very same article.

    Do you even read complete articles or do you just read portions and create your own conclusions ???

    You truly are special....




    Rumors circulated in the days following the incident that the attacks may have been racially motivated, with some people claiming on social media that black youths were deliberately targeting white people. Police officials said those rumors were false, stressing that the attacks were random.

    “There hasn’t been any indication that race is involved in this in any shape or form,” Philadelphia Police Lt. John Stanford told the New York Post.

    “Those kids that are actually assaulting people and robbing people, there’s a bigger issue that certainly goes beyond race,” he said. “Unfortunately, perception is reality for a lot of people, but that doesn’t mean it’s factual.”
    Now, read the highlighted portions, and try to understand. No one is questioning whether or not the attacks occurred, just whether or not they are racially motivated.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by BERNIE'S CORNER View Post
      And here are a few paragraphs from the very same article.

      Do you even read complete articles or do you just read portions and create your own conclusions ???

      You truly are special....




      Rumors circulated in the days following the incident that the attacks may have been racially motivated, with some people claiming on social media that black youths were deliberately targeting white people. Police officials said those rumors were false, stressing that the attacks were random.

      “There hasn’t been any indication that race is involved in this in any shape or form,” Philadelphia Police Lt. John Stanford told the New York Post.

      “Those kids that are actually assaulting people and robbing people, there’s a bigger issue that certainly goes beyond race,” he said. “Unfortunately, perception is reality for a lot of people, but that doesn’t mean it’s factual.”
      Yeah that's the commie Washington Post ****ing lying about what happened. That's why I didn't link to it in the first place. The only reason I linked to it was because Avacado boy doesn't accept any source that isn't flat out *******.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
        Now, read the highlighted portions, and try to understand. No one is questioning whether or not the attacks occurred, just whether or not they are racially motivated.
        Don't twist it....Read the bolded headline in thread title.

        Then you came in to confirm occurance with a Washington Post article.

        Where police tell writer it wasn't racially motivated.

        You my friend are full of it.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Xoo View Post
          Yeah that's the commie Washington Post ****ing lying about what happened. That's why I didn't link to it in the first place. The only reason I linked to it was because Avacado boy doesn't accept any source that isn't flat out *******.
          Oh now the story's inaccurate ?

          Don't hide....Let the hate consume you !

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Hype job View Post


            That's the default position the police take when reality places the ******* narrative under siege.
            Oh so the police are telling the truth when they shoot an unarmed person of color who they swore was reaching for a gun, but they are lying when allegedly some black children are attacking white people?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by BERNIE'S CORNER View Post
              Don't twist it....Read the bolded headline in thread title.

              Then you came in to confirm occurance with a Washington Post article.

              Where police tell writer it wasn't racially motivated.

              You my friend are full of it.
              The attacks occurred. The victims were white.

              Anything else you want to debate?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                Oh so the police are telling the truth when they shoot an unarmed person of color who they swore was reaching for a gun, but they are lying when allegedly some black children are attacking white people?
                Cops are pretty much obligated to lie about the motives of black people who attack whites for no reason. They get in deep **** when they don't.

                As for black perps getting popped, probably sometimes they do lie and sometimes they don't. Cops are not going to wait for someone to start shooting at them before shooting their own guns.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                  The attacks occurred. The victims were white.

                  Anything else you want to debate?

                  No need to debate.

                  You support and defend racisits it makes you a racist period.

                  Cut and dry...

                  Run along and hide behind Donald's apron and continue to practice read'n comprehension wing nut !

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by BERNIE'S CORNER View Post
                    No need to debate.

                    You support and defend racisits it makes you a racist period.

                    Cut and dry...

                    Run along and hide behind Donald's apron and continue to practice read'n comprehension wing nut !
                    How am I defending racists? You're awfully brave from behind your computer...

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                      How am I defending racists? You're awfully brave from behind your computer...
                      Brave behind a computer and up in your face.

                      Either you're be'n coy or as I've stated to you, you only half read sh !t.

                      Read XOO Uh Oh's post and threads.

                      If you're oblivious to it it only means one thing Einstein.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP