casual fans need to learn how to score a fight.....

[kafkod]

oh, no.....

defence ?

no way.....

we simply cannot have that now.....

..... can we .....?

loooool

you are ridiculous Tony

keep thinking that defence is a dirty word

keep thinking that defence is not official scoring criteria.....

the ONLY thing that..... " died on it's arse "..... are the casual-fan idiots who do not think that defence should be official scoring criteria

Is the strawman defence an official scoring criteria?

[aboutfkntime]

Weisfeld probably got caught up in the era that promoted that disgusting..... "score for the guy going forward"..... dribble

that was disgraceful, and was driven by greedy TV networks in an attempt to provide more "fan-friendly" fights..... you guessed it, for fatass casual fans

the fact remains.....

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* defence
* ring generalship


it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

I mean...if 0 punches are landed I could see a draw in the round...boxing is all about who is landing more and who is landing better. All there is to it really my friend.

Often times I agree that the aggressor is the winner...however the fighter going backwards can at times box very well and win a clear round. Lara/Mayweather were good examples of this.

Not to mention that 'aggressor' can be a bit subjective at times...I've seen some create narratives for fights about their guy being the aggressor when it wasn't really true...

Anyway it is all about hit and not get it my friend...that's boxing.

you are a walking contradiction, you casual-fan muppet.....

first you say..... "boxing is all about who is landing more and who is landing better".....

then you say..... " boxing is all about..... hit and not get it "

well, which is it..... ?

keep thinking that defence is not OFFICIAL scoring criteria..... as you continue to contradict yourself

[aboutfkntime]

Is the strawman defence an official scoring criteria?

it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO

[Boxing_1013]

you are a walking contradiction, you casual-fan muppet.....

first you say..... "boxing is all about who is landing more and who is landing better".....

then you say..... " boxing is all about..... hit and not get it "

well, which is it..... ?

keep thinking that defence is not OFFICIAL scoring criteria..... as you continue to contradict yourself

Little secret my friend...when you hit your opponent and don't get hit...you win...that means you are landing more and better punches...lol come on dude.

Steve Weisfeld:

"Defense: Defense is important because it helps a boxer set up his offense. Most judges that I have spoken to do not give credit for defense alone. If a boxer has a good defense, it means that he is not being hit with punches. But let's remember the purpose of the sport: to land punches on your opponent."

Just admit you lost here bro...anyway be well man, have a good evening.

[kafkod]

it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO

Another strawman!

I never said that volume is a scoring criteria, and neither did any of the other guys who are trying to educate you here.

[Chrismart]

the ONLY thing that..... " died on it's arse "..... are the casual-fan idiots who do not think that defence should be official scoring criteria

just wow

I haven't once mentioned defence in this thread. I said people cut and mark up differently, so it can't/shouldn't used to score fights. You might want to re-read my post. A cut face doesn't mean you lost more rounds than your opponent. Talk like that doesn't belong in a 'how to score a fight' thread.


the very signature of an idiot casual-fan, is that they do not value or appreciate defence

Yeah I hate defence. It must be Locche's 14 KO's in over 100 fights that makes him one of my favourites to watch.

Whittaker too, what a bum


surprise, surprise..... fan of the guy who missed 1000+ punches, could not get his game going, and got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense
I'm not a Wilder fan.

ring generalship, and clean hard punching..... no no, "volume"..... is suddenly more important than the official rules ahahaha

I've not once spoke about volume punching, ring generalship, effective aggression, fighting off the back foot or anything else you want to randomly reply to me about.

What are you going on about strawman? Your head appears to have fallen clean off. You can't keep track of what you are saying or who you are replying too

..........

[aboutfkntime]

a walking contradiction.....

.....boxing is all about who is landing more and who is landing better. .....

..... it is all about hit and not get it my friend...that's boxing.

[IMG]http://media2.*****.com/media/lT4sgCJwC7B4c/*****.gif[/IMG]



FACT: defence IS official scoring criteria, you muppet LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

Another strawman!

I never said that volume is a scoring criteria, and neither did any of the other guys who are trying to educate you here.

that is EXACTLY what you morons said

that is the very purpose of this thread

this thread is a response to all of you morons who supported TonyGE when he insisted that "punches landed" is the only official scoring criteria..... read post #1

the video I posted COMPLETELY dispelled that myth

now you morons are arguing what you think, the official scoring criteria should be..... and excluding what parts of the official scoring criteria do not really suit you, or the fighters you support LMAO

FACT: this is the ONLY official scoring criteria..... not that rubbish you muppets made up

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* defence
* ring generalship

like I said earlier, the very signature of a casual fan is dislike/disregard, and a general lack of appreciation, for defence

[aboutfkntime]

..... Yeah I hate defence. It must be Locche's 14 KO's in over 100 fights that makes him one of my favourites to watch.

Whittaker too, what a bum.....

it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO







the very signature of a casual fan is dislike/disregard, and a general lack of appreciation for..... defence

who cares what you like/dislike..... when did that become justification for anything important?