Suspended boxer blasted for fat-shaming Crawford's wife!

[Fabes88]

I disagree with this dumb decision.

No one can't have an opinion about anything these days...was it right or PC what he said? No.

Should he be suspended for what he said? Hell no.

Freedom of speech doesn't exist anymore, change my mind

He’s already suspended it wasn’t for these comments. Bottom line is you shouldn’t be talking trash about someone’s wife or anyone for that matter. Do you think he would ask Crawford that question to his face?

People say freedom of speech doesn’t exist but that’s just people who don’t want to take accountability for their words. Say what you want but just be man enough to deal with the repercussions.

[Fabes88]

He had a skinny side chick and she beat the **** out of her.

Lol I need to see this immediately let me search for it now

[The D3vil]

Eh, maybe she has a really good personality.

It's much more like that:

A: She used to be fine, but has pumped out some kids and let herself go.

or

B: She was down wit Bud from day one, before the money and he rewarded her by wifing her up.

Either way, I'm good that he's married to a sista.

[IceTrayDaGang]

She ugly as ****.......... She must have been the last girl left in the club at kick out time.

bro! crawford aint the shining star either! lol. these the type of females in crawford's bracket before boxing and money came along.

[IceTrayDaGang]

that's true love tho! so i cant hate on it.

[Idunnoshet]

bro! crawford aint the shining star either! lol. these the type of females in crawford's bracket before boxing and money came along.

This right here ^
Good point.

[Stuntman Mike]

The film "norbit" was based on actual events of bud and his wife's life

[#1Assassin]

Fair enough, not losing sleep over it



People in the west? It all makes sense now



It was neither slander(an untrue defamatory statement that is spoken orally).

Nor a threat(communicated intent to inflict harm or damage to a person or property to force someone's compliance or to restrict his or her freedom.

Other things are probably what fits your agenda, since it wasn't defamation(a false statement presented as a fact that causes injury or damage to the character of the person it is about.) either.



I respect your opinion



By that logic, why did you reply to my post then?

1. Well, i never heard of people in any other part of the world (and i have spent a lot of time on a lot of different continents) complain about their freedom of speech being violated so damn easily. and in the west it is happening CONSTANTLY.

again, so often people say something and when people respond they get mad and say their freedom of speech is being violated. as if it only applies to their opinions, but nobody else has the freedom to speak up in opposition. for the record both ************* and ******** do this. it is absurd and ive never seen it elsewhere.

2. i didnt say it was slander or a threat, i just made random examples of how you can't say anything. since a lot of people think freedom of speech means "you can say whatever you want". it doesnt, that was the point.

3. i wouldn't use the word "agenda". i just don't like hypocrisy. people are losing jobs for not standing for the national anthem (in support of people's rights, regardless how one might feel about it), telling people to "shut up and dribble", word for word. watch the imdb reviews of that barbershop show with lebron and it is an endless ****** of white people basically saying "******s don't deserve a voice or opinion". and those are examples of just about the most privileged and accepted black folks out there. yet the same people who want to take their voice think they have any ground to stand on when they feel silenced.

4. i just said it's funny. sort of a laugh or cry type of thing at this point as often as it comes up. but i do think it is something that needs to have some light shed on it. people should know what they are speaking of before complaining it is supposedly being stripped from them. especially since it is such a terrible thing when it is really taken, so lowering that bar as far as accusations go is dangerous with no potential upside (as far as i can tell).

5. even if he didn't violate any of those rules. i just feel the commissions have to protect the family of the deceased under circumstances like that. i don't have much more reasoning than that. it's simply no way to act, let's say it is in violation of basic decency. the commission doesn't have to grant a license to anyone as far as i know.

[Jubei]

IFL Umaf IFL ainit?

[Rip Chudd]

Eh, maybe she has a really good personality.

It's much more like that:

A: She used to be fine, but has pumped out some kids and let herself go.

or

B: She was down wit Bud from day one, before the money and he rewarded her by wifing her up.

Either way, I'm good that he's married to a sista.

I agree with the bold. She's been riding with Bud since day 1, why get rid of her. Plus they have several kids together. She knows that dude like a book, no reason to let her go, even if she has plumped up a bit