Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There's been no drug testing for Pacquiao-Horn.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
    This is a thread about the fact there is no PED testing for the Horn/Manny fight. No matter what you think Floyd did, that is in no way relevant to the thread topic.

    Let's just discuss how you feel about no PED testing for this fight. Are you ok with it? Does it make you think both guys are juicing? When there was no PED for jmm/Manny you accused jmm of roid use. If Horn ko's Manny will you accuse him as well(

    If Manny ko's Horn, is it ok for Fans to ask if or accuse Manny is juicing?

    Please answer.
    No

    I don't think PAC is juicing, is there any testing by the state commission? You gotta remember this

    Testing doesn't mean anything

    Look st Armstrong, look at Russia and other boxers who can easily beat the system, you see what I mean ? If a guy is roiding, wada or usada wont stop it if it's a highly sophisticated doping programmes. Why? Because these programmes are designed to dope and to get away with it

    There will be some form of testing in this fight, they didn't go all out to most likely save money as the fight could be a financial disaster

    The reason I accused Marquez is because he worked with someone who helps people dope and get away with it, that is the only reason. He worked with a guy that laughed at usada and vada and said they can't detect serious doping

    You know why I am su****ious of Floyd, dude the guy is a doper and you know it, just look at the iv treatment, be honest if PAC got caught doing what Floyd did, that would be the nail in the coffin in terms of everyone here saying PAC is a doper, but you are showing your double standards by not calling Floyd or on it


    Remember this is a fact

    Floyd took the same iv treatment is Armstrong

    Armstrong used that treatment to avoid detection of peds

    Floyds volume of iv and excuse for using it makes no sense

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by revelated View Post
      Floyd Mayweather has never stopped larger fighters inside of 6 rounds. He breaks them down with an accumulation of punches. Any fighter can do that - well, except Paulie.
      That doesn't mean crap brother. Even tennis players use roids; baseball players, etc. Duh.

      Berto, Pederson, Bey, Leon Love, etc., got caught juicing. Two got caught by VADA, the others got caught by the commission by urine samples.

      Did you suspect these people of cheating? Keep your idiocy to yourself.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by genrick View Post
        That's blackmail mate.
        Maybe. I doubt it will happen.

        Let's just hope the drug testing would be highlighted in this McGregor/Mayweather fight. MMA is infested with drug cheats. It would be criminal if Connor is the only one properly scrutinized in this fight.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
          Exactly

          It's well known Floyd doped in his last retirement and is somehow considered clean when he stops between fights like this time

          Forever a cheat
          Isn't it strange the first presscon in the McGregor circus hasn't even been given a schedule yet even though it was already announced weeks ago? This is not the first time, though. They always wait for Floyd's go signal. (Testing begins right after the first presscon.)

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
            No

            I don't think PAC is juicing, is there any testing by the state commission? You gotta remember this

            Testing doesn't mean anything

            Look st Armstrong, look at Russia and other boxers who can easily beat the system, you see what I mean ? If a guy is roiding, wada or usada wont stop it if it's a highly sophisticated doping programmes. Why? Because these programmes are designed to dope and to get away with it

            There will be some form of testing in this fight, they didn't go all out to most likely save money as the fight could be a financial disaster

            The reason I accused Marquez is because he worked with someone who helps people dope and get away with it, that is the only reason. He worked with a guy that laughed at usada and vada and said they can't detect serious doping

            You know why I am su****ious of Floyd, dude the guy is a doper and you know it, just look at the iv treatment, be honest if PAC got caught doing what Floyd did, that would be the nail in the coffin in terms of everyone here saying PAC is a doper, but you are showing your double standards by not calling Floyd or on it


            Remember this is a fact

            Floyd took the same iv treatment is Armstrong

            Armstrong used that treatment to avoid detection of peds

            Floyds volume of iv and excuse for using it makes no sense
            Had jmm and Manny been tested that fight there would be no questions. So you used circumstantial evidence to convict him because he beat Manny.

            Yet people can't do that here if Manny wins since there is also no testing.

            The only thing more disgraceful than your hypocrisy is your continued attempts to derail the thread by bringing up Floyd.

            Sorry but you can't hide from this.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by ironmt View Post
              I could see If Horn was obligated to test and Manny wasn't, but that Is not the case. So how Is testing relevant In his fight? Do you believe that one fighter has the advantage over the other when neither guy was obligated to be tested?
              no testing or not starting testing immediately is used by posters to question if a fighter is clean. The same thing should be done here since there is no testing.

              As to your questions, the better fighter has more of an advantage if there is no testing because we assume both could use since the likelihood of getting caught is reduced.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                no testing or not starting testing immediately is used by posters to question if a fighter is clean. The same thing should be done here since there is no testing.

                As to your questions, the better fighter has more of an advantage if there is no testing because we assume both could use since the likelihood of getting caught is reduced.
                So we should assume they are both dirty and Pacquiao has the advantage because he Is the better fighter?

                Comment


                  #58
                  An entire thread has gone and switched topics because they don't want to discuss Manny not doing any drug testing for this fight. Is this real life? Is Manny on the juice? Probably. Does it seem off that this fight doesn't have testing? Yes.

                  Why are so many capes being put on and this topic being diverted into something that this thread wasn't about? If Floyd is heavily on yalls mind, why not make thread #1,555,192,002 about him already?

                  but but but Floyd doe.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    Had jmm and Manny been tested that fight there would be no questions. So you used circumstantial evidence to convict him because he beat Manny.

                    Yet people can't do that here if Manny wins since there is also no testing.

                    The only thing more disgraceful than your hypocrisy is your continued attempts to derail the thread by bringing up Floyd.

                    Sorry but you can't hide from this.
                    Roidweather and Armstrong are proof passing testing means nothing

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Mike D View Post
                      Honestly what does it even matter?

                      I'm assuming that you think he just beat the system all those years, correct?

                      If he passed a lot of you dudes wouldn't even believe it anyways. Hell he could take a drug test daily all year around but for those of y'all who thinks he is (or was) a PED cheat is that going to change your opinion? How many tests did he pass through his entire career? Did any of those matter to you? No. You always thought he was a cheat regardless.

                      So again, WHAT'S THE MOTHERF**KING POINT.

                      As if that is so impossible.

                      Did Armstrong or Mosley ever test positive their entire career?

                      Seems they "beat the system all those years"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP