Why do people hate Floyd so much?

[b00g13man]

He's the best fighter they've ever seen in their lifetime.

Look at which fighter they use as a measuring stick when they're really impressed by another fighter.

If they don't think Floyd is that great, why use him? Why say so and so is better than Floyd to make a point of how great so and so is?

For example, do you see anyone saying Lomachenko has already surpassed or is greater than Arturo Gatti? No, because then they won't be making a point of how great they think Loma is. They have to use the greatest fighter they saw in their era to make a point. So they use Floyd. It's unintentional praise if anything, not really hate. They believe they're hating, but all they're doing is exposing their true beliefs of Floyd without even knowing it, they will be in denial if you accuse them of such thing, but it's true.

They're terrible at hating, they can't even do it properly, they look like they have high respect for Floyd

So much truth.

[The Big Dunn]

Record history accurately? Dude. Nobody is altering anything. Floyd is an all time great. Hasn't lost. Made record $. What more can a fan of his want?

Is there going to be question marks absolutely. Are there going to be folks who don't put him up there with Ali and Srl, every day of the week. You cats hate that critics say he fought some of his biggest names and best comp late, yeah errybody's just haters, but in the case of Pacquaio, it's so apparent that the Pacquaio non fight in 2009 burns at you cats souls so bad that you can't just accept the career for what it is. Pacquaio refused take a test ok its a fact you happy now, we heard that a million times, but in the end it looks like it's haunting you Floyd cats more. You should have been on Floyd for having the little guy right at the table and not making the fight; making the fight before this guy gets sparked out by one of his biggest rivals, but no ya not going to do that. If i was a Floyd die hard like that i would be cool, but some of yous It's like you cats won the battles but still lost the war.

When did I suggest he was as good as Ali or Robinson?

What I am asking about is people holding that against him when Manny decided not to fight as I've mentioned before, since in other cases you blame the guy that wouldn't fight.

How does it make sense to be on Floyd for a decision another man made? You still keep avoiding that point. I'm simply asking you hold every fighter accountable for their actions the same way.

Because you don't, you are making this about Floyd fans calling out the inconsistencies we see. It's as if you don't want Floyd fans to do that.

Manny decides not to fight Floyd, signs to fight jmm again, gets ktfo. That has no bearing on Floyd's greatness, only manny's and JMM's.

It's not about battles, it's just about reading what you post and asking how you arrived at the conclusion you did when in all other discussions you arrive at the logical conclusion.