Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

List 10 fighters with a better resume than Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Why are people mentioning Morales as a great win for poochiao? Morales was shot to pieces when he finally beat him and poochiao got his ass whooped by a waaaaaaay past prime version of Morales. Let's not forget his loses to those Asian taxi drivers as well. No way in hell does he have a better resume than floyd.
    Last edited by Xi_; 10-11-2016, 03:16 PM.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
      ok i will stay with main opinion.

      Ali have Norton,Frazier2x Foreman Coper and 2x liston it alone is better than floyd.

      Even with Pac lost some he still have as good if not better resume,you are wrong here.
      Pac is not my favorite i like Floys more and his better fighter but credit to pac for resume here he is better.
      Please don't insult my intelligence. You like Pac and I understand that he is somewhat of a people's champ, but you can't erase the losses he suffered to the hands of mediocre fighters to fit your reality. Pacquiao's resume will always be lesser than Floyd, not to mention that he lost to the man in rather humiliating fashion.

      You may have a point about Ali though. At least Norton wasn't as bad as ****ing Singsurat.
      Last edited by KingHippo; 10-11-2016, 03:15 PM.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
        losses count too...just saying

        he lost to guys mayweather beat clearly....Marquez and lost to no names early in his career....lost head to head to mayweather

        mayweather has far more title defenses and defeated more world champions

        has far more title fight wins.....its not close

        manny may be your preference but he doesnt have a better resume than Mayweather
        Your just making rules up as you go along now. Robberies don't count now? Well Castillo was roibbed against st Floyd as was maidana.
        So not fighting outside yoiur country don't matter now? Floyd is like Sven ottke.
        F!oyd also gets penaliuzed for not fighting prime fighters, or taking risks. Not fighting people at their bests weights or cws
        Last edited by hugh grant; 10-11-2016, 03:25 PM.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
          lay off the no way in hell does kostya tszyu, Camacho, Barrera and some of those guys have better resumes

          you make like them more but come on bro.......look Marquez resume....Mayweather has a win over him and beat more champions won more titles, in more divisions more lineal, the whole 9

          Same goes for Nelson, whitaker, morales, and many others

          people seem to bring in emotion and throw out logic when it comes to mayweather's accomplishments
          I see what you're saying. Here's what I'm basing it on, man.

          Nelson fought a prime Salvador Sanchez and he came in with like, ten fights. He nearly won, too. He faced a prime Pernell Whitaker. He lost but he still fought him. No excuses. No complaining about money/concessions whatever. He just fought him and didn't do too bad IMO.

          Morales fought prime Barrera. Then he fought him in two rematches. He didn't bat an eye. He fought Pac in 2005 and beat him. Not 2015- 2005 when Pac was rolling over one opponent after another and at 130 where he was much more dangerous.

          Whitaker fought everybody in his era and many of them at their best. He won most of the time. He faced a 87-0 Chavez and of course, won in most people's eyes. He beat a prime Nelson. He faced young hungry lions in De La Hoya and Trinidad. He faced a beast in Trinidad and was not a natural welterweight. Now that's balls, my friend.

          And titles? Well, we know those aren't worth that much these days. It's all about the prime elite fights you fought. How many prime elite guys did he fight?

          Mayweather himself stated that he was smart about who he fought. Well, that's great, but it doesn't show courage- not the kind of courage those guys had.

          And I do admit, Camacho was a stretch. Haha. He did face a young Trinidad, young DLH and a prime Chavez, though.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            Your just making rules ypuo as you go along now. Robberies don't count now? Well Castillo was roibbed against st Floyd as was maidana.
            So not fighting outside yoiur country don't matter now? Floyd is like Sven ottke.
            F!oyd also gets penaliuzed for not fighting prime fighters, or taking risks. Not fighting people at their bests weights or cws
            That's ****ing one robbery. How many times was Marquez robbed against Pacquiao?

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
              losses count too...just saying

              he lost to guys mayweather beat clearly....Marquez and lost to no names early in his career....lost head to head to mayweather

              mayweather has far more title defenses and defeated more world champions

              has far more title fight wins.....its not close

              manny may be your preference but he doesnt have a better resume than Mayweather
              if you think so ok i still say that champs dont matter but actual names,Pac for me have better resume,I like floyd more and his betterfighter but resume ways Manny is better for me prime MAB and Morales are huge wins.asi said Marquez and Pacman are same size ,and Floyd is bigger then them by far man you cant ignore that,but Floyd is better fighter i agree.And dont say Guys,its only JMM.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
                Thats true but somes fighters fotage are limited even now.
                Yeah. I wish they weren't. No Greb and I've only seen Robinson-LaMotta VI. Would love to see the others.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
                  Please don't insult my intelligence. You like Pac and I understand that he is somewhat of a people's champ, but you can't erase the losses he suffered to the hands of mediocre fighters to fit your reality. Pacquiao's resume will always be lesser than Floyd, not to mention that he lost to the man in rather humiliating fashion.

                  You may have a point about Ali though. At least Norton wasn't as bad as ****ing Singsurat.
                  idk why this loses when he was hungry kid matter to you so much,i cant get it.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
                    That's ****ing one robbery. How many times was Marquez robbed against Pacquiao?
                    It don't matter how many times yoiu think jmm was ribbed. Thasts just one opponent. Jmm only counts as one oersdon. PACs kryotinite

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
                      if you think so ok i still say that champs dont matter but actual names,Pac for me have better resume,I like floyd more and his betterfighter but resume ways Manny is better for me prime MAB and Morales are huge wins.asi said Marquez and Pacman are same size ,and Floyd is bigger then them by far man you cant ignore that,but Floyd is better fighter i agree.And dont say Guys,its only JMM.
                      Replace Pacquiao's best wins with his worst losses and you have nothing left.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP