Originally posted by L33tboxingdewd
View Post
The reason why you rate Cotto so low is obvious, you don't like him. You see "most" people agreed with the judges in both the Mosley and Clottey fights. You my friend are in the minority on that one, boxingscene does not represent the majority. You say Cotto has not defeated elite fighters, well neither has Canelo, because unless something changed MOST boxing pundits and fans don't consider Lara,Angulo, or Kirkland elite. Cotto has been in the ring with better competition and ultimately looked and still looks far better.
You say Cotto is stiff? ******ity really, he movees fluidly around the ring and his foot work is at a level that Canelo will never reach. Canelo is like a zombie in the ring, left foot, right foot, stop combo, hopefully he stands right in front of me to get hit, that's about as much ring IQ/ring generalship you'll get from Canelo. Cotto has knocked out bigger opponents, where Canelo hasn't knocked out anyone over the welterweight limit, (Angulo, Kirkland were shells)look at his resume, most of his knockouts are against career welterweights and JR welterweights, and you expect me to believe that he hits harder then Cotto?
And for your info I am a big fan of Canelo, had him loosing to Trout and winning against Lara. But really your post reeks of bias, when damn near everyone agrees Canelo's advantages are strength, size and youth, the rest goes to Cotto, including trainer and team.
Comment