Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Rejects Rehydration Clause For Rigondeaux
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View PostI'm tired of seeing a significant size difference between fighters campaigning in the same weight class, that's why.
it's part of the game
same day weigh ins and dehydration clauses just mean you see medically dangerous zombie fights, nothing else, guys will still fight as low as possible
there's a reason we got rid of it back in the day
Comment
-
Originally posted by King_ View PostTake ANY thread on NSB and see your name with a post in it and I already know 10000000% exactly what fighter you're gonna d**k ride and what fighters you're gonna talk **** about.
You're so salty and angry all the time. Lmfao. Go have some fun dude.
Comment
-
Rigo is to blame here, plain and simple. Either move up to 126 or you don't get the fight, that's all there is to it. Lomachenko doesn't need to fight Rigo- dude has only 5 pro fights and is already a bigger name He fought on Mayweather-Pacs undercard. He's got the higher ceiling as far as career potential goes. He's only 26 and younger, and he's got more time to fight the better competition.
Rigo can either accept a no rehydration clause (wtf) orhe can continue to fight unknown, random Thai's and former MMA fighters on free-Japanese cartoon network.
So, basically... all the upset RigoTARDS who know their hero's career is basically coming to an end- are upset and sad that their boy is going to retire with one career good win and will continue to be basically irrelevant in boxing. Ha ha ha ha haaa
Comment
-
Oh. And easy work Loma.
The dude can step on Rigo and crush him. Rigo would get dominated- that's why he wants and needs these outrages clauses and demands.
Lame. Rigo is blocking the fans from getting a FANTASTIC fight. Oh well. Back to free Japanese TV!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cruisin' View Postthen complain to the fighters? they choose how much they're willing to cut
it's part of the game
same day weigh ins and dehydration clauses just mean you see medically dangerous zombie fights, nothing else, guys will still fight as low as possible
there's a reason we got rid of it back in the day
Comment
-
Originally posted by tiliheels View Postthis seems pretty fact based tho..lot of ppl call out weights to block fights..like ggg164...now that ward is saying ok to 164 u might see ggg's next play go off on a cotto canelo tangent..but imo ward shouldnt 164 bc ggg chan make 168 easy and rehydrate and rigo shouldnt 126 bc he is not a natural 122 guy and does not rehydrate past 126...its all about the numbers with me..
imo smaller fighters should never demand a guy move down to fight them, you're asking him to show up malnourished
while it's pretty easy for the smaller fighter to just put on a couple lbs of muscle and see what happens
either fight him at his normal weight or agree like gentlemen that it's just not gonna happen.. in a fantasy world anyway
i don't wanna see GGG fight a starven version of ward either, what's the point?Last edited by ////; 07-20-2015, 11:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by King_ View PostRigo is to blame here, plain and simple. Either move up to 126 or you don't get the fight, that's all there is to it. Lomachenko doesn't need to fight Rigo- dude has only 5 pro fights and is already a bigger name He fought on Mayweather-Pacs undercard. He's got the higher ceiling as far as career potential goes. He's only 26 and younger, and he's got more time to fight the better competition.
Rigo can either accept a no rehydration clause (wtf) orhe can continue to fight unknown, random Thai's and former MMA fighters on free-Japanese cartoon network.
So, basically... all the upset RigoTARDS who know their hero's career is basically coming to an end- are upset and sad that their boy is going to retire with one career good win and will continue to be basically irrelevant in boxing. Ha ha ha ha haaa
Comment
-
Rigotard here, and as I've said in other threads concerning pretty much the same topic about these two, Lomas team I feel is in the right for telling Rigos camp to kick rocks about the hydration clause.
Probably the fight I'm most looking forward to, but if it goes down the crapper over it, I'm not putting the onus on Loma.
Comment
Comment