Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cotto responds to Trinidad

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Trinidad should shut the **** up. Cotto is the lineal one hundered fifty something pounds champion.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by jri9d0 View Post
      LMAO. Cotto is no DLH and no defensive wizard Winky.

      Cotto's Achilles heal was and always has been pressure fighter's with heavy hand's and good stamina Tito is both.

      Hence you do the math.
      Cotto is as good if not better a boxer than DLH, stop lying to yourself. Oscar liked to slug it out more than he ever liked to box, he just boxed against Tito which is how to fight him. Trinidad had game changing power and I didn't say Tito had no chance of winning, but he's not winning on anything except his power.

      He isn't anywhere near the pressure fighter Margarito was. He was a stalker not a pressure fighter. It's a close fight but anyone who even remotely boxed Tito basically won as I said, he was very limited.

      Comment


        #23
        So now im dominican because i said cotto is better than tito?? okay! Lol Whatever makes you sensitive dames feel better I guess.
































        #daddyissues

        Comment


          #24
          Tito would have ended this chicken mother****ers career in less than 4 rounds.

          Tito was a FAR better counter puncher with that left then he ever gets credit for. I actually wonder if some of you people have watched the fighters you talk about/criticize. saying "He limited doe" sounds kind of dumb when your comparing him to a ****ty fighter like Cotto.

          Since Trinidad I don't believe there has been even 1 fighter in welter or light middle
          with his type of power

          Oh yeah and lets not forget Trinidad had the heart of a lion and was willing to fight ANYONE. Then we have Cotto who is mentally very fragile and a ****ing duck too.
          Last edited by lightsout_finit; 07-09-2015, 10:48 AM.

          Comment


            #25
            Trinidad would **** Cotto up.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
              Cotto is as good if not better a boxer than DLH, stop lying to yourself. Oscar liked to slug it out more than he ever liked to box, he just boxed against Tito which is how to fight him. Trinidad had game changing power and I didn't say Tito had no chance of winning, but he's not winning on anything except his power.

              He isn't anywhere near the pressure fighter Margarito was. He was a stalker not a pressure fighter. It's a close fight but anyone who even remotely boxed Tito basically won as I said, he was very limited.
              you are trolling again beater... either that or you are smoking some weird stuff..

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Agent Mulder View Post
                So now im dominican because i said cotto is better than tito?? okay! Lol Whatever makes you sensitive dames feel better I guess.































                #daddyissues

                Nah, I am sensing Jackson Heights bank teller all the way. Something in the delivery that is lacking real conviction however unwavering.


                #PeasantUncertaintyCrisisInCrackerUniverse

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
                  Cotto is as good if not better a boxer than DLH, stop lying to yourself. Oscar liked to slug it out more than he ever liked to box, he just boxed against Tito which is how to fight him. Trinidad had game changing power and I didn't say Tito had no chance of winning, but he's not winning on anything except his power.

                  He isn't anywhere near the pressure fighter Margarito was. He was a stalker not a pressure fighter. It's a close fight but anyone who even remotely boxed Tito basically won as I said, he was very limited.
                  Please spare me the speil, you comparing Cotto boxing ability to that of DLH when Cotto's competition compared to DLH has been less than steller especially when moving up is about as laughable as Donald Trump campaigning at a Taco Bell. My point is it's difficult to compare skill when the competition you are measured against isn't on your level to begin with. (I.e Foreman, Degeale to name a few) Thus your point is mute.

                  My response in my original post was to what way Tito would win with all of the odds pointing in his favor from ring experience, to power, chin and of course stamina. Cotto is no DLH to keep Tito honest nor Winky to use his masterful definsive skills at close quarters. Therefore, Tito > Cotto again.

                  And as for your Margarito jib, Tito was even more relentless going forward than Antonio ever was with demonic punching power that Tony lacked brickless or not. So how does Cotto win again?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Ouch. Them be fightin words by Cotto! lol. Don't like to hear that either as both of them are countrymen and should be on the same side.

                    Tito had some real talk I thought with what he said about Cotto's chances against GGG and in regards to the comp level recently by Cotto at middleweight. With that said, it was a pretty low blow to state that once Tito lost the championship, he never came back from it.

                    Cotto's is more of an insult vs Tito was just giving a no bias comparison of what many others have said already.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
                      Ouch. Them be fightin words by Cotto! lol. Don't like to hear that either as both of them are countrymen and should be on the same side. Tito had some real talk I thought with what he said about Cotto's chances against GGG and in regards to the comp level recently by Cotto at middleweight. With that said, it was a pretty low blow to state that once Tito lost the championship, he never came back from it.

                      Cotto's is more of an insult vs Tito was just giving a no bias comparison of what many others have said already.
                      That's what I was wondering: Where's this beef between two Puerto Rican champions coming from? I could see if they were both active during the same era, but that isn't the case.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP