Comments Thread For: Campbell: Pacquiao Might Go Right Through Bradley

[PAC-BOY]

Reason enough for Pac not to pursue revenge and chase JMM instead I guess. Just saying if it were that easy to beat the guy he would have gotten it done by now, instead he chose another route.

not really. Why fight a fight you already won? Decisively. Also with a fighter with a Rios type fan base.
Realistically it was supposed to be an easy win for Manny...and it was. Not one he would break the bank with thats for sure. A solid win with a solid undefeated fighter.
That turned into one of the worst decisions in boxing history. WITH a known judge (CJ. Ross) that has had insane bad decisions before.

[mathed]

not really. Why fight a fight you already won? Decisively. Also with a fighter with a Rios type fan base.
Realistically it was supposed to be an easy win for Manny...and it was. Not one he would break the bank with thats for sure. A solid win with a solid undefeated fighter.
That turned into one of the worst decisions in boxing history. WITH a known judge (CJ. Ross) that has had insane bad decisions before.

........won so decisively he lost the fight? If you got robbed in a fight you thought you clearly won, wouldn't you want to set the record straight? Especially if you knew you could beat the other man's azz so easily? Like RJJ did to Griffin?

[PAC-BOY]

Sooooooo when was the last time pac had a KO??? lol

2009. Compare that to the P4P CHICKENS CHAMP...Floyd in 2007 id say its okay. I mean especially that Cotto Clottey Marg and Mosley were all much bigger. All but Clottey take a look at their faces lol. WoW!!!
(no....i did not count Floyds sucker punch as a ko)

[PAC-BOY]

........won so decisively he lost the fight? If you got robbed in a fight you thought you clearly won, wouldn't you want to set the record straight? Especially if you knew you could beat the other man's azz so easily? Like RJJ did to Griffin?

Without the ***ed up corrupt judging...In the eyes of Experts, Hardcore fans , as well as casual fans. Even Professional fighters and Star athlethes call it a robbery and a clear win for Manny.
What fighter says he has to go back and look at the tape to see if he won? LMFAO! He knew he loss. He told Arum he loss after the fight. I like Bradley as a fighter. Hes a good person as well. An A class fighter & Athlete. But he loss that fight DECISIVELY! Hes a ***ing liar and a poser. Thats all i can say bad about him.

[WESS]

2009. Compare that to the P4P CHICKENS CHAMP...Floyd in 2007 id say its okay. I mean especially that Cotto Clottey Marg and Mosley were all much bigger. All but Clottey take a look at their faces lol. WoW!!!
(no....i did not count Floyds sucker punch as a ko)

I didn't ask about Floyd nor did I say he would KO someone. But at least you see how bad your opinion is since Pac hasn't KO'ed anyone in nearly a half decade.

Good Job by the way. You actually got the answer right! I figured it would be a tough one for you.

[mathed]

Without the ***ed up corrupt judging...In the eyes of Experts, Hardcore fans , as well as casual fans. Even Professional fighters and Star athlethes call it a robbery and a clear win for Manny.
What fighter says he has to go back and look at the tape to see if he won? LMFAO! He knew he loss. He told Arum he loss after the fight. I like Bradley as a fighter. Hes a good person as well. An A class fighter & Athlete. But he loss that fight DECISIVELY! Hes a ***ing liar and a poser. Thats all i can say bad about him.

All that aside, you still didn't answer the question. Why not get revenge if you knew it was that easy to beat the guy, especially if you knew you got robbed while easily and clearly beating him the first time? I can understand the idea of "Well, he knew who really won the first time" but he was offered the rematch and he turned it down. Now he it looks like he is giving into Bradley who has more momentum than Pac..............if he doesn't win again or looks less than impressive, that could muck his career up pretty bad right?

[noStylez]

All that aside, you still didn't answer the question. Why not get revenge if you knew it was that easy to beat the guy, especially if you knew you got robbed while easily and clearly beating him the first time? I can understand the idea of "Well, he knew who really won the first time" but he was offered the rematch and he turned it down. Now he it looks like he is giving into Bradley who has more momentum than Pac..............if he doesn't win again or looks less than impressive, that could muck his career up pretty bad right?

Pretty obvious right, Marquez fight was bigger money. This is a sport but it's more about business now.
It's probably a smarter move to rematch Bradley now than it would have been to have an immediate rematch.

[WESS]

........won so decisively he lost the fight? If you got robbed in a fight you thought you clearly won, wouldn't you want to set the record straight? Especially if you knew you could beat the other man's azz so easily? Like RJJ did to Griffin?

They don't understand it and choose to ignore that Pac didn't look good as he was expected too vs a fighter who wasn't a WW. The fact that Pac looked bad, and could have quit possibly lost again, they didn't want anything to do with that rematch.

[Earl-Hickey]

It's a solid fight now that Bradley is WW. Could his previous fights cause problems vs Pac, possibly. But lets not remember how bad he made Pac look too. Either way I find the fight interesting and wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Bradley legitimately won this time. However I would rather see Pac win. If Pac loses to Bradley again, it's over for Pac. Pac can't afford to lose another fight. Especially to someone who can box.

er...... what?????

[-Makunouchi-]

good fight, the most logical fight since the chicken wont fight him.