Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Froch is so slow and skill-less he makes Danny Garcia look alright

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Cupocity303 View Post
    He is better than what he looks like through the prism of your Television set.

    Go tell that to Andre Dirrell - a fast, slick fighter who while competitive didn't have an easy time with the slow, skill-less Froch.
    Froch has become really good at the subtle, understated things that good fighters do and most fans don't notice.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by TmZaclk View Post
      ATG chin, hahaha. Jermaine Taylor knocked down froch. At one point in round 9 Froch was hurt more than Kessler at any point of the fight. Kessler has a better chin than Froch.
      yah i think people confuse a great chin with a great heart....froch has a good chin, but it's not an ATG chin...

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by TmZaclk View Post
        Kessler has been shot since 2010. Today he took Froch to life and death. Froch is same old same slow and fkuk.
        Styles make fights. He can come back the next fight and knock someone out the way he did Bute.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by TmZaclk View Post
          Kessler has been shot since 2010. Today he took Froch to life and death. Froch is same old same slow and fkuk.
          The truth is Carl Froch lost to Dirrell, lost to Kessler. Almost got taken out by Taylor who is not a 168 pounder. He beat an AA, he beat Bute and Pascal - these are his main victories at 168. He is the biggest overachiever in any sports. He is slow, so off balance, so sloppy, Kessler lands 55% on him. The guy beat Kessler by a round or two. Kessler right now is a bad copy of what he used to be years back when he fought Zaghe. Kessler was so slow in there and Frocuh was missing with some punches by a foot or two at times not inches. His results tell a different story. He's cagey and strong willed and has a good stamina and chin. However, his skill and talent are not elite and you can't argue with that. His best win is Bute who got knocked out by GGG wearing a helmet. To me his best victory was over Pascal, he won at least 7 rounds against a very game and underrated fighter.

          Comment


            #25
            Froch isn't a crisp fighter but he still gets the job done.

            Comment


              #26
              Yeah he is slow but I wouldn't say he is "SKILL-LESS"

              I like George Groves chances against Froch I will say this, and it wasn't because of today's fight or anything like that, I think any fighter with some speed and some slickness and is slippery enough to avoid Froch Power...CAN BEAT HIM! I think Groves can do that while beating Froch to the punch with his Hand Speed!

              Yeah Groves haven't been test I get all that but styles make fight and I think Groves style would be a horrible match up for Froch at this point in his career against a young fighter who is extremely slick
              Last edited by sicko; 05-25-2013, 06:43 PM.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by pesticid View Post
                The truth is Carl Froch lost to Dirrell, lost to Kessler. Almost got taken out by Taylor who is not a 168 pounder. He beat an AA, he beat Bute and Pascal - these are his main victories at 168. He is the biggest overachiever in any sports. He is slow, so off balance, so sloppy, Kessler lands 55% on him. The guy beat Kessler by a round or two. Kessler right now is a bad copy of what he used to be years back when he fought Zaghe. Kessler was so slow in there and Frocuh was missing with some punches by a foot or two at times not inches. His results tell a different story. He's cagey and strong willed and has a good stamina and chin. However, his skill and talent are not elite and you can't argue with that. His best win is Bute who got knocked out by GGG wearing a helmet. To me his best victory was over Pascal, he won at least 7 rounds against a very game and underrated fighter.
                Check out this sore loser Kessler fan, lmao! Cry baby lol...

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Master Chief View Post
                  ATG Chin? Who is the ATG/HOF type puncher to test that chin?

                  Are you serious? Let me guess another butthurt Kessler fan? Both guys have brilliant chins! Froch has been in with Taylor, Abraham, Kessler x2, Bute all very good punchers and took monster shots without flinching.

                  Why does it always have to be HOF/ATG and come down to a **** measuring contest? I genuinely find it pathetic when people/fans of the sport have to go back several decades to try prove a point.

                  There is no denying both guys have solid whiskers. Now we'll play your game, name me better super middleweights that have fought at world level with better chins.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    thats just his style

                    everyone always goes on about him keeping his hands low but its a tactic to get his opponent to come in and leave himself open. it works every time.

                    great fighter

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by TmZaclk View Post
                      ATG chin, hahaha. Jermaine Taylor knocked down froch. At one point in round 9 Froch was hurt more than Kessler at any point of the fight. Kessler has a better chin than Froch.

                      Holyfield got knocked down and out against James Toney does that mean he didn't have an ATG chin?
                      Foreman was knocked down and stopped by Ali, does he not have an ATG chin?
                      Oh and Taylor >Green in everyway, shape and form.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP