It was a good fight and a close one, but Pacquiao pulled it out. More powershots landed, more shots landed, more thrown, he was the aggressor- Marquez fought well, but didn't do enough. His corner deserves lots of blame. Marquez only landed like 11 or 12 shots per round.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum Calls For a Fourth Pacquiao-Marquez Showdown
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View Postpeople here are complaining that pacquiao didn't deserve the fighter of the decade award for 2000-2009 cause he just came off a controversial win in 2011
and im the one grasping at straws?
ok buddy
I literally kept saying that all these haters declaring the fight a mismatch, and marquez old and bloated and slow would immediately say after the fight (if marquez won/made a good fight), that he would never get his respect, and people would just resort to saying pac is overrated, etc., etc. . .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostAt the time at 135 he would of have given him fits , Manny is a good fighter that got over hyped because of some great match making and CWs , how did Teddy put his WW resume , " Made to Order " , time to step up and take his just desert from Floyd , geez I would not be at all surprised if Manny could not win a single round against Floyd .
Comment
-
I had Manny winning 115-113 but if it goes the other way it's understandable. I am a big Pacman fan but I don't see him beating Gayweather. Marquez is a legend. You've got to give him credit for his performance at 38 years old. No need for a 4th fight. et's get Mayweather and Pacman next year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View Postok, so this has become a "pacquiao is overrated!" chant.
did it ever occur to you guys that maybe marquez went in with the perfect game plan? or probably put the weight better this time?
god help us all that marquez had something to do with it.
and i don't even like the little whining ****
hes what hes been at lower weights. The difference is lighter guys could (sometimes) handle his speed while slow guys like cotto and margarito can't.
pac is still the fantastic fighter he always was. Hes just not the superevolved machine most of his fans think he is nowadays.
hes the same... for good or bad.
Comment
-
remove arum from the deal and we would have fair scoring, end of.
a ****in robbery to say the least.
im as disgusted as all those faithful mexicans who new their man won.
if he lost the first or even the second, then by this performance he certainly won by atleast three clear rounds.
bollocks to any **** who says different.
its ****in scandalous.
whens arum gonna dig a ****in hole and jump in, ****.
Comment
-
Originally posted by William Blake View PostIt was a good fight and a close one, but Pacquiao pulled it out. More powershots landed, more shots landed, more thrown, he was the aggressor- Marquez fought well, but didn't do enough. His corner deserves lots of blame. Marquez only landed like 11 or 12 shots per round.
Comment
-
Originally posted by uglypug View PostI literally kept saying that all these haters declaring the fight a mismatch, and marquez old and bloated and slow would immediately say after the fight (if marquez won/made a good fight), that he would never get his respect, and people would just resort to saying pac is overrated, etc., etc. . .
Comment
Comment