are you ******ed or blind? im guessing both b/c if you look, read and comphrend the numbers, pac threw more and leanded less while floyd threw less and land more
i dont see why your calling me names!!!!!! going by the compubox numbers manny clearly landed more punches on mosley then floyd did !!!!! if you dont believe me take a look yourself !!!!!! mayweather was more efficient but manny was more deadly !!!!! and whats so impressive is mosley didnt go in to survival mode once he was put on the canvas as so many people claim !!! MOSLEY WAS IN SURVIVAL MODE FROM THE OPENING BELL !!!!!!!!!!
look at the fight percentage and see who dominated more..numbers dont like people....sure mannys hits harder..but floyds was more accurate and took less percentages of the shots in his fight
I suppose you're addressing my thread with this new thread..
Firstly we got to agree that Mosley didn't even fight the same fight against Pacquiao that he did against Mayweather.
Against Mayweather, Mosley took a lot more chances, being the aggressor for at least half the fight. This automatically gives Mayweather more opportunity to land shots because Mosley made himself an easier target to hit.
Against Pacquiao, Mosley was boxing on the backfoot and hardly engaged at all for nearly the whole fight. This automatically reduces the opportunity for Pacquiao to land shots because Mosley became a harder target to hit.
Now what is extremely surprising is that Pacquiao actually landed more shots than Mayweather, even though Mosley made himself a harder target to hit! Pacquiao landed 224 shots... Mayweather landed 208! And again, Mosley landed MORE punches on Mayweather than he did on Pac. So take from that what you will.
The connect percentage just boils down to accuracy. Of course, we all know Mayweather is one of the most accurate out there, but connect percentage is only a very minor issue in real terms, what's much more important is the number of shots actually landed in a fight. It's not like judges sit around calculating the connect percentage.. they don't ever factor that in AT ALL but they do factor in the Number of Shots Landed.
I suppose you're addressing my thread with this new thread..
Firstly we got to agree that Mosley didn't even fight the same fight against Pacquiao that he did against Mayweather.
Against Mayweather, Mosley took a lot more chances, being the aggressor for at least half the fight. This automatically gives Mayweather more opportunity to land shots because Mosley made himself an easier target to hit.
Against Pacquiao, Mosley was boxing on the backfoot and hardly engaged at all for nearly the whole fight. This automatically reduces the opportunity for Pacquiao to land shots because Mosley became a harder target to hit.
Now what is extremely surprising is that Pacquiao actually landed more shots than Mayweather, even though Mosley made himself a harder target to hit! Pacquiao landed 224 shots... Mayweather landed 208! And again, Mosley landed MORE punches on Mayweather than he did on Pac. So take from that what you will.
The connect percentage just boils down to accuracy. Of course, we all know Mayweather is one of the most accurate out there, but connect percentage is only a very minor issue in real terms, what's much more important is the number of shots actually landed in a fight. It's not like judges sit around calculating the connect percentage.. they don't ever factor that in AT ALL but they do factor in the Number of Shots Landed.
floyd walking mosley down started after the big punches in the second round to close out the end of the round throughout the rest of the fight
pac threw nearly 300 more shots to only land 16 more punches. the fact that yall are using that as if its something to boast abotu is saddening and shows how full of excuses yall are
floyd walking mosley down started after the big punches in the second round to close out the end of the round throughout the rest of the fight
pac threw nearly 300 more shots to only land 16 more punches. the fact that yall are using that as if its something to boast abotu is saddening and shows how full of excuses yall are
Nah, it's the other way around really, if you think about it. This is a boxing match.. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO THROW PUNCHES. Here you dudes are saying Pacquiao's somehow at fault for THROWING PUNCHES! lol.. I wonder if you guys know how ridiculous you sound.
man i don't care about anything people got to say I watched both fights and can think fo myself..floyd vs shane was a fight..mosley got schooled and that was it..against pacquiao it was like a sausage fest..they kept touching gloves every 2 second..no action at all..next time they should put a bed inside the ring and let them make out if they like each other so much..I bet paris hilton would pay to attend the huggery.
Nah, it's the other way around really, if you think about it. This is a boxing match.. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO THROW PUNCHES. Here you dudes are saying Pacquiao's somehow at fault for THROWING PUNCHES! lol.. I wonder if you guys know how ridiculous you sound.
250+ more just to land 16g more? Bwahaha. Bless your poo
rsoul
your a ****ing total moron watch the fight ...mosley was in a full sprint from pacquiao !!!
and he was coming in twards floyd !!!
if he was rushing in on pacquiao like he did floyd he would have bee koed end of ***ing story two total diffrent fights your complete ****ing idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!
its like comparing pac jmm and floyd jmm
RATARDS
your a ****ing total moron watch the fight ...mosley was in a full sprint from pacquiao !!!
and he was coming in twards floyd !!!
if he was rushing in on pacquiao like he did floyd he would have bee koed end of ***ing story two total diffrent fights your complete ****ing idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!
its like comparing pac jmm and floyd jmm
RATARDS
i watched the fight..no need for cursing and name calling???you mad bout something??
Comment