Damn dude you didn't have to take your sig pic off. It was just a question!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who Won Pac-Bradley? Post fight discussion STOP MAKING NEW THREADS ABOUT THIS FIGHT.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by megadeth View Post
What you should be asking yourself is how he could possibly lose so many rounds to a 38 year old Marquez, who he dragged up to 147, when he and his own team says he is a natural Jr. Middleweight.In the bold part, you are lying bastard! How the hell Pac is a natural jr. middleweight when he never weigh in more than 148-149 even fight night. Liar.
Last edited by straightleft; 06-07-2012, 08:53 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tredh View PostI like Bradley's demeanor right now. Whats wrong with not liking your opponent? Bradley not playing around and it is showing. Personally I don't like all that buddy buddy stuff from fighters at the staredown and at the weigh in. How you gonna be friendly with a guy who in a few hours is trying to knock your damn head off?
I saw it as Bradley is coming to bring it and try his best to win. Manny was just being Manny. I think Manny was a little caught off guard by the change in Bradley from the face off and the pressers where Bradley was a little more friendly.
Comment
-
rather than talk about how he didnt look good, concentrate on whether he won convincingly. Only the JMM we are led to believe he didnt win convincingly and i agree he didnt win convincinly, certainly not as expected.
But he beat Clottey and SSM convincinly and to say he didnt look good is just whingeing, as the fighters were just trying to spoil. Can you look good against someone like BH? A win is a win. ANd Pacs wins over Clottey was exceptional. Clottey had taken Cotto to the wire and if you look at things in perspective, it remains an awesome performance by Pac. He made Clottey look exceptionally bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View PostHougigo is supposed to grab his nuts and you say he is not confident
Yet you won't bet 300 bucks to his account
Hypocrite
Comment
-
-
pac mostly deserves the criticism:
?clottey: gets a pass from me. joshua was a ranked WW and only viable option at the time. berto/shane was tied up. floyd was unavailable. etc.
?margs: complete BS. undeserving especially for the 154 title... foreman was a more legit opponent if he wanted a 154 belt. but i think bob wanted to protect his ***ish champ. pac's excuse of pillow-fisted yuri being "too tall" was suspect.
?shane: complete BS. another undeserving opponent. ortiz or berto wouldve been acceptable at the time.
?jmm: a cherry pick that backfired... surprisingly, the WW version of jmm turned out to be an elite choice. so i give him props on that.
?tim: redemption fight... pac needs this
bottom line, he couldve finished margs but understandably let him off the hook... he dominated shane but couldnt capitalize on a retreating shane, so pac looked like sh�t.... he "underestimated" jmm and paid for it, thats when fans officially turned on him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Luilun View PostI bet all these fools that pick Bradley over Pacquiao kept their native IQ of 70
projecting? I think so...
(projecting means accusing someone else of having a problem or issue that you yourself has, just in case you weren't sure...)
Comment
Comment