The QUESTION SHOULD BE:Should Sergio REPLACE Floyd as 2# P4P?

[Ragnar Lothbrok]

to me, its dumb to put Floyd lower then 2. He's either #2 or he's not on the list at all. Dont say you are dropping him lower because he's inactive. That doesnt make sense. You either have him where you think he really is or you drop him totally because of inactivity.

Im a Floyd fan but Im always fair. Unlike alot of others though, I could care less about Floyd being ranked in terms of inactivity. I dont have any problem with people not wanting him on the list. Who cares? We all know how good he really is and where he is really ranked as a fighter. Then when he fights you just move him back up in the top 2.

However, I think its dumb to say that he's 3, 4, or 5 because of inactivity. Come on now, that makes no sense. It doesnt even make sense for him to be lower then 3 no matter what. I love Donaire but lets be real, he's not over Floyd with his resume in any kinda way and that goes for anyone else not named Pac or Sergio. I only think Pac really has a claim as #1 but again, Floyd is 2 or drop him totally. Definitely not lower then 3

i sort of agree with this post d, but what im saying is that the question that should be asked is whether sergio replace floyd not pac. not saying sergio should replace floyd, but that is more of the proper question than sergio replacing pac.