Originally posted by Spray_resistant
View Post
That is exactly what P4P ranking is, and that is why I said earlier that it cannot be taken too seriously.
P4P status is a theoretical comparison between fighters, who often fought in completely different era's, and in completely different weight divisions..... in order to determine who was the best fighter.
Most mythical P4P match-ups could never happen because of weight disparity.
You are only referring to the current P4P rankings, and just happened to get lucky that the #1 and #2 P4P are in the same division, during the same era.
It's not about titles, and it's not about legacy.
P4P is based on the concept of the latin phrase Ceteris paribus, or, if all things are equal. It does not just apply to boxing. But the boxing "equal" is weight. Having different weight divisions is how boxing applies "equal".
Mythical P4P match-ups - e.g. Wlad in the top 10 - are based on if both fighters just so happened to be the same size/weight, and in their prime.
So, NOT a meeting arranged at catch-weight, a true relative match-up..... e.g. if a prime Ivan Calderon was 6'6"-250lbs, and took his relative power up to HW with him, could he beat Wlad?
I say that a prime Calderon with relative HW power and the same speed would have more than enough to keep Wlad off him, and would confound him to a UD.
Don't hate on me Wlad fan's, very few HW's in history are genuine P4P fighters imo. That's why HW is my least favorite division.
P4P is completely based on opinion, and nothing else.
When literally applying the phrase Ceteris paribus to boxing, it does not accommodate catch-weights. Why would a true P4P fighter fight at catch-weight?
Comment