Originally posted by EL_cano
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dan Rafael: "A seven-day cutoff is quite REASONABLE but Floyd still REFUSED to budge"
Collapse
-
-
Yep, they keep dragging out the 18 days like it's some bullet proof argument, but all it proves is how ****** they are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by trainhard_187 View PostBut WADA found it necessary to stop testing within a 18day window for the Floyd vs. Shane fight.. twice the number of days Pac is requesting to stop testing..
If WADA found it necessary to stop at 18 then im sure the 7 day window wouldnt be an issue. If they felt the fighter could juice up then they would of tested them closer to the fighter ESPECIALLY the proven PED user Shane.?
Now if WADA finds it ok to cut off at a 7 day window, then dont you think it would be ok. Cause they are the experts.
I've explained this repeatedly, but when the USADA stopped testing after 18 days, they did not notify Mosley and Mayweather that testing would stop. As far as Mosley and Mayweather were concerned, they could have been tested again, which deters them from cheating. What Pac wants is 7 days where he cannot be tested. The difference is obvious.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bee Keepz View PostAh, now I see, no wonder. Good luck arguing with this *******s, "14 days was fair, 7 is not".
Is it the 14 Day cut off Floyd asked Pac fair??
Yes its fair
... Piolo Pascual, piye, playaballer1, pmkilla, Poochiao, postmortem, PR13, Precision, Pretty Boy1, Pretty Boy32, PrettyBoy22, project xxx1, Punker, PureBoxer, qwerty07, R.M {7}, rambov, Rampage1978, Rasjudah, Ravishing, Rbgnwo, Red_Menace, ree****yaluss, Reloaded, RenovatioPR, revs1227, RL_GMA, robn0id, Roger Yomama, rommel357, RossCA, Royce.hams@gmai, rskumm21, RupertHolmes, S H A R K B O Y, S.G., Salvatrucho, Sammy2g3, sceneboxing, ...
As I said earlier in this thread when someone asked me the same question, No, not really. If Mayweather backs down and allows him a cutoff, I won't be happy. I think they should do the full testing. I'll be happy I get to see the fight, and if there was a 0% of the fight being made without a cutoff, then I guess I'd have mixed feelings about it. Manny wanted some crazy cutoff time, and Mayweather compromised with a 14 day cutoff and he still said no. I thought it was fair, in a sense, but I think it was the wrong thing to do. There really isn't a single good reason why they both can't do the full testing without cutoff dates.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red_Menace View Post
As I said earlier in this thread when someone asked me the same question, No, not really. If Mayweather backs down and allows him a cutoff, I won't be happy. I think they should do the full testing. I'll be happy I get to see the fight, and if there was a 0% of the fight being made without a cutoff, then I guess I'd have mixed feelings about it. Manny wanted some crazy cutoff time, and Mayweather compromised with a 14 day cutoff and he still said no. I thought it was fair, in a sense, but I think it was the wrong thing to do. There really isn't a single good reason why they both can't do the full testing without cutoff dates.
I will never get why they made such a big deal out of this (unless they are guility) but if they are not guilty it was one of the dumbest stands in the history of sport for a guy that would otherwise have 0 question marks (most likely).
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostThis is pretty much what I see, this issue has snowballed to the point where Manny has to man up if he wants it to go away, people can say wahtever about Floyd being a ***** but there is nothing he can do to solve this issue, other than offer the opputunity to prove he is clean in the biggest possible arena.
I will never get why they made such a big deal out of this (unless they are guility) but if they are not guilty it was one of the dumbest stands in the history of sport for a guy that would otherwise have 0 question marks (most likely).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red_Menace View PostAs far as I'm concerned, if WADA says it is necessary to test in the final week, then it's necessary to test in the final week. That is their standard procedure. The only reason I can think they'd want to test in the final week is to prevent doping. What he could do in the final week, I don't know. What reason does Manny have to require he not be tested in the last seven days, ignoring the lame excuses like becoming a weakened fighter, or it being dangerous to his health (which it is not)?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostThis is pretty much what I see, this issue has snowballed to the point where Manny has to man up if he wants it to go away, people can say wahtever about Floyd being a ***** but there is nothing he can do to solve this issue, other than offer the opputunity to prove he is clean in the biggest possible arena.
I will never get why they made such a big deal out of this (unless they are guility) but if they are not guilty it was one of the dumbest stands in the history of sport for a guy that would otherwise have 0 question marks (most likely).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pullcounter View Postwait... but the 2nd negotiations never happened... so what are we really arguing about?
Manny looked pretty bad the first go around and has yet to even attempt to clean up that mess.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pullcounter View Postwait... but the 2nd negotiations never happened... so what are we really arguing about?
Comment
Comment