Cotto is a nice mix of boxing and brawler so most will find him more entertaining.
Mayweather is makes it a point not to take risks so hes not exciting in that way but he has superior defense which some people find entertaining to watch.
Cotto is a nice mix of boxing and brawler so most will find him more entertaining.
Mayweather is makes it a point not to take risks so hes not exciting in that way but he has superior defense and which some people find entertaining to watch.
Why a yawn? I just want to know who everyone would rather watch. Yes May beats Cotto 9 out of 10 times if they fought, but at least Cotto fights are entertaining to everyone. I only know a few people (hard core boxing fans) that can sit through and appreciate a May fight.
If I had to choose between a Cotto or a Floyd fight.
Id watch Mayweather.
It's really a hard one for me. I can appreciate both their styles. I just think Cotto gives the fans what they want to see. So to the casual fan Cotto would be more entertaining.
Of course you would. The question is who is more entertaining or more exciting fighter. Are you saying Mayweather is an exciting fighter? Oh come on just be real for once.
Um yeah Im not one of these boxing fans who has to have a fight be Gatti-Ward to be entertained. Watching Floyd paint boxing masterpieces is VERY exciting to me.
Comment