If Castillo beat Mayweather, why can't JMM??

[andres aza]

Simple question. IMO Marquez is and has been better than Castillo, not by much but still. Thoughts?

[2501]

Wasn't aware that Marquez was such a physical in fighter.

[larry x]

first of all castillo LOST TWICE
secondly those fights were 8 years ago..boxers learn
3rd floyd was MOVING UP IN WEIGHT and castillo was the bigger stronger guy in the rings

and did i mention CASTILLO LOST...TWICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[larry x]

This castillo **** is old,boring and played out..you cant make up you own results...floyd beat castillo twice..get over it

[THE REED]

Floyd also hurt his hand really bad in the first fight... although i STILL have Foyd losing that first fight... ive watched it at least 8 times.

[UnDeniable]

Because Castillo outweighed Floyd by 10lbs, Castillo was always huge compared to Mayweather

BTW, Castillo would have beaten JMM, JLC was 10x as good as Juan Diaz

JMM is greater than JLC though, Juan is an excellent fighter

[SkilledB]

man may beat him twice, the second time more convincingly then the first.
plus JJM and JLC are 2 differnet fighters

JLC is an inside body ****er, jmm is a counter puncher who is becomming more of a sluggger now

[bojangles1987]

I don't get how the situations are comparable. Castillo was the bigger man and is a pressure fighter. Marquez is the smaller man and isn't a pressure fighter.

[cottosucks84]

oh please

Castillo did not beat floyd in EITHER fight. Floyd won the more clearer rounds their were 4 rounds that could of went wither way in the 1st fight. Also take in mind castillo was 9 pounds heavier and he was in his prime. But don't forget this folks styles make fights not triangle therioes. Cotto mosley margarito is perfect example

[Pullcounter]

Simple question. IMO Marquez is and has been better than Castillo, not by much but still. Thoughts?

castillo was the bigger guy but he did not win either fight.

jmm is better than castillo but he is a much smaller boxer.

can't really compare the two