This is a serious question.. Ok, I see a lot of Mayweather fans who like to bring up Margarito's losses. They call him a bum for having lost 5 times. Then when speaking on Baldomir.. they speak of him as if he was one of the greatest welterweight champions to ever live! OK, but if you apply the same logic used for Margarito to Baldomir.. Baldomir is an even bigger bum because he had more losses in his career when he fought Mayweather then Margarito does now.
Margarito would have dominated Gatti and Zab Judah worst then Baldo did.
When it really comes down to it Margarito>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Baldomir.
Margarito is a better fighter.. If you think otherwise then you must be smokin something.
You put these two in against each other and Margarito wins a UD.
So why is it that they call Margo a bum but Baldo is this great champion?
Don't make sense...
Margarito would have dominated Gatti and Zab Judah worst then Baldo did.
When it really comes down to it Margarito>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Baldomir.
Margarito is a better fighter.. If you think otherwise then you must be smokin something.
You put these two in against each other and Margarito wins a UD.
So why is it that they call Margo a bum but Baldo is this great champion?
Don't make sense...
Comment