Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calzaghe vs. Hagler @ 168

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
    hasn't 168 only been around since the late 80's?

    that's not saying much.
    late 70's I believe. Could be wrong though. To be considered the greatest in any weight is saying a lot actually.

    Comment


      #32
      Calzaghe would stop hagler !

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by theghost#1 View Post
        late 70's I believe. Could be wrong though. To be considered the greatest in any weight is saying a lot actually.
        i thought it was 80's. i'll look it up when i'm not lazy to google.

        it's quite an accomplishment BUT we are talking about arguably one of if not the greatest middleweights ever. middle is more prestigious and historically tougher. who's #1 aside from hagler? monzon? that's about it.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
          i thought it was 80's. i'll look it up when i'm not lazy to google.

          it's quite an accomplishment BUT we are talking about arguably one of if not the greatest middleweights ever. middle is more prestigious and historically tougher. who's #1 aside from hagler? monzon? that's about it.
          I agree with you. although i think SRR is the greatest middle.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by theghost#1 View Post
            I agree with you. although i think SRR is the greatest middle.
            i consider ray robinson more a welter but that's me. he was a hell of a middle too though.

            Comment


              #36
              calzaghe doesnt stand a chance , hagler would knock calzaghe out cold with a sneeze

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by BRAVE-HEART View Post
                calzaghe doesnt stand a chance , hagler would knock calzaghe out cold with a sneeze
                Not even a little chance.LOL. Sneeze huh.

                Comment


                  #38
                  yea because Calzaghe has been KO'd before...... typical overrating of older fighters, the fight would be alot closer than what people are saying.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    hagler wouldnt have stopped joe, so therfore he would have been slapped the **** up and lost on by a wide UD..

                    Haglers the most overated fighter, hes not even that good

                    i think tommy hearns has better chance coz hes taller and a better counter puncher.

                    Haglers just a brawler, a easy win for joe
                    Last edited by SpArKeD-CoLd; 08-22-2008, 04:31 AM.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      I like Calzaghe in this. I think his speed would give Hagler a lot of problems, and the medium range he boxes at was not Hagler's favourite either, he liked to be either at a distance or up close. Hagler also tended to tire in the later rounds and although he would fight up until the final bell, he would be a lot slower and clumsier in the second half of the fight. Calzaghe would eat this up.

                      Hagler's best route to victory is to come out and go after Calzaghe like he did with Tommy Hearns. Calzaghe has never been in with something like that. Calzaghe has a better chin than Hearns though, so I think I'd expect him to survive. Calzaghe Decision.

                      NB: Now before getting mad about this, just think about it. A boxer who is usually faster than his opponents, throws more punches and is very hard to stop is a very hard boxer to beat.
                      Last edited by abadger; 08-22-2008, 05:22 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP