Why do ******s put Lockett in the same category as Calzaghe?

[Mickey Gomez]

Seriously, you're highlighting your ******ity.

Locket couldn't lace Calzaghe's gloves.

Stylistically, Calzaghe is a nightmare for Pavlik.

[abadger]

HINT: The answer's in the question.

[withoutthee88]

Seriously, you're highlighting your ******ity.

Locket couldn't lace Calzaghe's gloves.

Stylistically, Calzaghe is a nightmare for Pavlik.

Just like Paul Williams was a stylistic nightmare for anybody in the welterweight decision, right?

[5burowz]

Joke Cal sucks

[x-PeROxiDE-x]

Just like Paul Williams was a stylistic nightmare for anybody in the welterweight decision, right?

Did he not just win by big first round KO?

Although, I see your point. Williams was only hyped like that because of his size though. Calzaghe only gets that recognition because he will make Pavlik miss so much it's unreal.

[Left Hook Tua]

Seriously, you're highlighting your ******ity.

Locket couldn't lace Calzaghe's gloves.

Stylistically, Calzaghe is a nightmare for Pavlik.

i doubt they're doing that. if they do they're dumb or baiting.

people are just impressed with pavlik's win. kinda like how joe shocked me in his lacy dominance. if i never saw the lacy fight i doubt i would have picked joe to squeak out a win against hop which i did.

[krispy kreme]

Seriously, you're highlighting your ******ity.

Locket couldn't lace Calzaghe's gloves.

Stylistically, Calzaghe is a nightmare for Pavlik.

Statistically how?