Originally posted by Scott9945
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Larry Holmes Jab
Collapse
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostWas that Holmes decision though?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostHaven't seen that fight in at least 30 years, tbh. Holmes probably squeaked it out. But Witherspoon had only 15 fights then and hadn't reached his peak. He certainly was more deserving of a title shot than Holmes next two unqualified opponents, Scott Frank and Marvis Frazier.
The guy had serious talent and skills but never reached full potential or success
Comment
-
Holmes always stayed away from the really big guns in the heavyweight division. In addition, he could have started competing at high level long before he did. He stayed out to let the good fighters retire or grow old. Facts are facts.
His big problem as a fighter was that he just thought he was such a tiger. Still, he was a pretty tough guy who almost makes the top ten, maybe even slides in at #10. Let's face it, the man had no punch, and he was without the speed of Ali to compensate for that. No punch is what you expect from a man with a sunken chest. In his era the heavyweight division (which receives so many accolades from people stranded in time) was already beginning to slip badly. The golden age of the division was before Holmes, not during his tenure.
But this is about jabs, and he had a great one.
Cooney was a nobody, a one-handed fighter, and he is at the top of Holmes' ledger in terms of quality. Shavers, etc. were never championship material but would have made good contenders in any era. He faced no great fighters in their primes, or even close to it.
In the end, legacy always comes down to who you fought and when you fought them. Holmes is not the last to forget this.Last edited by The Old LefHook; 03-23-2015, 03:39 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Old LefHook View PostHolmes always stayed away from the really big guns in the heavyweight division. In addition, he could have started competing at high level long before he did. He stayed out to let the good fighters retire or grow old. Facts are facts.
His big problem as a fighter was that he just thought he was such a tiger. Still, he was a pretty tough guy who almost makes the top ten, maybe even slides in at #10. Let's face it, the man had no punch, and he was without the speed of Ali to compensate for that. No punch is what you expect from a man with a sunken chest. In his era the heavyweight division (which receives so many accolades from people stranded in time) was already beginning to slip badly. The golden age of the division was before Holmes, not during his tenure.
But this is about jabs, and he had a great one.
Cooney was a nobody, a one-handed fighter, and he is at the top of Holmes' ledger in terms of quality. Shavers, etc. were never championship material but would have made good contenders in any era. He faced no great fighters in their primes, or even close to it.
In the end, legacy always comes down to who you fought and when you fought them. Holmes is not the last to forget this.
Comment
-
Larry had his faults, and he did probably duck at least 7 good fighters/contenders during his time.But the man had a great jab, that is undeniable.However, it would have been interesting if he fought someone with a real good jab and skills like Greg Page, and Pinklon Thomas during his IBF reign.Chances are, he's coming out with a loss.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dynamite76 View PostLarry had his faults, and he did probably duck at least 7 good fighters/contenders during his time.But the man had a great jab, that is undeniable.However, it would have been interesting if he fought someone with a real good jab and skills like Greg Page, and Pinklon Thomas during his IBF reign.Chances are, he's coming out with a loss.
I think he would have had more trouble with Witherspoon in a rematch.
Comment
Comment