Originally posted by poet682006
View Post
Makes sense....To me when one considers how many decent fighters there are that never get anywhere near elite status, much less beat an elite fighter. I have a problem calling these fighters that do well despite never competing at this level...."bad" or even "fair" and what about all those fighters that are talented, "good" but cannot fight the best?
Then you have a guy like Sanders who beat one of the best (and gave Vitali a run as well) now I could say he was good and better on account of his victory. I can live with that. In my mind I consider bad, fair good great.....biiiiig jump and then eliite. But great could be "very good" just the same.
Comment