Ok, first thing obviously, I know these two met in 1988.
In that year Holmes was forced out of retirement (38 years of age), past his best and was aiming was to attempt to dethrone a prime Tyson who was basically knocking the **** out of nearly every opponent he was getting in the ring with.
So what if Holmes faced Tyson back when Holmes was in his prime, during the years in which he made 20 successive defenses of his title (I'm sure Tyson made a statement after the fight saying that against a prime Holmes - he didn't stand a chance - he was ''simply the greatest of his time.'' )
Holmes had one hell of a jab, which he partly demonstrated in the 4th round 88' fight with Tyson and showed some nifty footwork too, but due to his age was at a disadvantage.
So would a prime Holmes have used that jab to dominate Tyson from the outside in his younger years? Would Tyson's power have been too much for a prime Holmes?
Let me hear your opinions please.
Cheers
In that year Holmes was forced out of retirement (38 years of age), past his best and was aiming was to attempt to dethrone a prime Tyson who was basically knocking the **** out of nearly every opponent he was getting in the ring with.
So what if Holmes faced Tyson back when Holmes was in his prime, during the years in which he made 20 successive defenses of his title (I'm sure Tyson made a statement after the fight saying that against a prime Holmes - he didn't stand a chance - he was ''simply the greatest of his time.'' )
Holmes had one hell of a jab, which he partly demonstrated in the 4th round 88' fight with Tyson and showed some nifty footwork too, but due to his age was at a disadvantage.
So would a prime Holmes have used that jab to dominate Tyson from the outside in his younger years? Would Tyson's power have been too much for a prime Holmes?
Let me hear your opinions please.
Cheers
Comment