Your entire argument is that Hopkins' biggest wins are guys who campaigned at welterweight, while completely ignoring that Trinidad was a middleweight champion at the time of fighting Hopkins, and was favored to win, and was a class of fighter that comes along only a few times an era. You then go on to say that because other smaller men were not successful, that clearly extraordinary cases (like legendary Tito) should be grouped up with cases like Alvarez vs. Khan, when the calibers of the fighters in question are universes apart. You're trying to tell me that Danny Jacobs would have been more of a problem for Hopkins than Trinidad, when Trinidad would have stopped Jacobs no question. Lara was seriously a more dangerous opponent for Alvarez than Mayweather? One more time, be real about the situation. Trinidad was clearly a special fighter, and doesn't belong in the same group as Khan or Brook. They don't even beat guys that are their size :/