The perfect analogy on why Paulie M. will beat Hatton

[Vladimir303]

Malignaggi (the boxer) did better in his loss to Cotto (the agressor) then Hatton (the agressor) in his loss to Floyd (the boxer)

Now Malignaggi the boxer will go up against a come forward (agressor) fighter in Hatton, who isn't as good as Cotto in terms of punching power or accuracy. Some might say "well malignaggi isn't as good as Mayweather either". Well Malignaggi has more foot speed and uses much more movement then Floyd that it will virtually be impossible for Hatton to hold and make it his type of fight. The whole pressure theory of Hatton being even better at it then Castillo has already been proven wrong. And with a guy like Malignaggi who is on the bicycle for the full 12 rounds, I doubt Hatton will be effective.

Even against Collazo, a guy who has pretty decent movement (although not as good as Paulie's) he showed his weaknesses. Some might attribute that to him moving up to 147 but I don't buy it.

Malignaggi will outbox him bigtime.........remember the comment above after it happens.....it makes perfect sense.

[luv3s2sp00g3]

i agree. I dont even particularly like malignaggi but I still think he'd beat hatton.

[THe TRiNiTY]

It makes sense, to a certain extent. However, I don't see it being an easy fight for anybody. Paulie had problems against a fighter with less then 20 fights to his name in his last outing.

[Johnny Rebel]

I'm sure you will have no excuses and give Hatton proper credit after he wins...

[luv3s2sp00g3]

Mayweather Hatton was the definition of a fighter getting "exposed". It just showed how one dimensional Hatton is. Hattons heart is directly proportional to how one dimensional he is, and I think that might even be the reason people like him so much.

[sparked_85]

Hatton's one dimension will still blast Malignaggi and stop him in the mid-rounds unlike Cotto.

I disagree with the fact Malignaggi's footspeed will be better than Hattons......it won't. Hatton has great footspeed and will be going forwards not backwards.

Malignaggi gets smashed up pretty bad.

[Dynamite Kid]

Malignaggi (the boxer) did better in his loss to Cotto (the agressor) then Hatton (the agressor) in his loss to Floyd (the boxer)

Now Malignaggi the boxer will go up against a come forward (agressor) fighter in Hatton, who isn't as good as Cotto in terms of punching power or accuracy. Some might say "well malignaggi isn't as good as Mayweather either". Well Malignaggi has more foot speed and uses much more movement then Floyd that it will virtually be impossible for Hatton to hold and make it his type of fight. The whole pressure theory of Hatton being even better at it then Castillo has already been proven wrong. And with a guy like Malignaggi who is on the bicycle for the full 12 rounds, I doubt Hatton will be effective.

Even against Collazo, a guy who has pretty decent movement (although not as good as Paulie's) he showed his weaknesses. Some might attribute that to him moving up to 147 but I don't buy it.

Malignaggi will outbox him bigtime.........remember the comment above after it happens.....it makes perfect sense.

Hatton did't struggle with Collazo cause of movement he struggled with him because he is a Southpaw

Malignaggi uses lateral movement to offset his oponents attacks cause he has no power to get thier repesct to stop them walking him down so instead he uses lateral movement to keep them turning so he offsets thier attacks that might have worked up untill a point against Cotto but that is because Cotto is to patient at times

Hatton & Cotto are not the same fighter just because they come foward

[pins0099]

Well Malignaggi has more foot speed and uses much more movement then Floyd that it will virtually be impossible for Hatton to hold and make it his type of fight.

Just take another look at the N'goudjo fight. He might be a good boxer and have fast movement but he got caught all night long and LOST the fight despite the biased NY judges, Hatton IMO is superior in just about every department to N'goudjo. At 140 Hatton can ****, Malliangi has got a good chin but N'goudjo managed to demoralise him with a few clean shots and a couple of cuts if I remember rightly, I see Hatton having even more success.

The whole pressure theory of Hatton being even better at it then Castillo has already been proven wrong. And with a guy like Malignaggi who is on the bicycle for the full 12 rounds, I doubt Hatton will be effective..

By what, one fight against arguably the BEST boxer in the world? Yep, I guess so, completley disproven.

[WetSexyLlamaPR]

Meh. I think Hatton will beat Paulie based on his not having any pop whatsoever in his punches. Paulie is a good boxer don't get me wrong but I think whenever he faces an agressive, strong, come forward fighter like Cotto and/or Hatton he'll end up losing. I don't think Ricky will be able to knock him out but I think he will win by decision. You need some sort of punching power to keep a fighter like Ricky Hatton from indiscrimately coming forward and roughing you up. Since his power is essentially non-existent I see this fight similar to his fight with Cotto.

[Addison]

Malignaggi (the boxer) did better in his loss to Cotto (the agressor) then Hatton (the agressor) in his loss to Floyd (the boxer)

Now Malignaggi the boxer will go up against a come forward (agressor) fighter in Hatton, who isn't as good as Cotto in terms of punching power or accuracy. Some might say "well malignaggi isn't as good as Mayweather either". Well Malignaggi has more foot speed and uses much more movement then Floyd that it will virtually be impossible for Hatton to hold and make it his type of fight. The whole pressure theory of Hatton being even better at it then Castillo has already been proven wrong. And with a guy like Malignaggi who is on the bicycle for the full 12 rounds, I doubt Hatton will be effective.

Even against Collazo, a guy who has pretty decent movement (although not as good as Paulie's) he showed his weaknesses. Some might attribute that to him moving up to 147 but I don't buy it.

Malignaggi will outbox him bigtime.........remember the comment above after it happens.....it makes perfect sense.

You know this is about as generic as the triangle theory if not more so right? Slotting these guys into "boxer" and "agressor" categories is rough shot to say the least. The implications here are mind numbing. This thing has got more holes than swiss cheese and will get twisted 80 different ways.

As far as I'm concerned, it's an insult to Mayweather, Hatton, and Cotto to get mentioned altogether with Paulie frickin Malignaggi..