Curran is the Real Deal at 145.

[ƒallenloki]

Who saw that performance against Marlon Sandro?

Wow. This guy is clutch. He's been the underdog in almost every fight and always shows up.

[CiganoBoxer]

Who saw that performance against Marlon Sandro?

Wow. This guy is clutch. He's been the underdog in almost every fight and always shows up.

He beat Ronnie Mann via decision ,i know Ronnie well and hes no joke ether...awesome fight that was

[chiguy91]

[Jack3d]

I disgaree. Just because a guy is clutch doesn't mean he's the real deal. Ben Roethlisberger is more clutch than Aaron Rodgers, but that's doesn't mean Ben is the better QB.

****ting the bed for the first couple rounds and then pulling out the win, doesn't make Curran a better fighter than Sandro, IMO

[ƒallenloki]

... but a head to head KTFO victory in a tournament final does.

[F l i c k e r]

I disgaree. Just because a guy is clutch doesn't mean he's the real deal. Ben Roethlisberger is more clutch than Aaron Rodgers, but that's doesn't mean Ben is the better QB.

****ting the bed for the first couple rounds and then pulling out the win, doesn't make Curran a better fighter than Sandro, IMO

Ummm... 2 super bowls and being the sole reason they won..... yeah, i think so.

Pitt were in shootouts both superbowls under Big Ben. So, defense wasn't the reason they won those games. I'd rather have Ben than Rodgers in my super bowl. 2x vs 1x.... yeah.


As for Curran. I agree. I wouldn't put him up there yet but if he can keep it up, then he can be considered real deal. just my opinion.

[Jack3d]

Ummm... 2 super bowls and being the sole reason they won..... yeah, i think so.

LMFAO. No

In Ben's first superbowl he had zero touchdowns and 2 picks.

Even Antwaan Randle El had a touchdown pass in that game.


In the second superbowl, the game winning drive had more to do with Santonio being a very good clutch receiver than ben being a good QB.

Ben is good but he is nowhere close to elite.

In 3 superbowl appearances he's had 2 touchdowns to 5 interceptions. It is most definitely his defense that is winning those games or at least bailing him out.

Pitt were in shootouts both superbowls under Big Ben. So, defense wasn't the reason they won those games. I'd rather have Ben than Rodgers in my super bowl. 2x vs 1x.... yeah.

Again, how much of those point in the superbowl were passes from Ben? Not many. He's thrown more interceptions in the Superbowl than touchdowns. He's also had a beast run game and a stellar defense under one of the greatest defensive minds in nfl history.

[F l i c k e r]

Can't argue against that. You win this one sir.... But there is no telling where Rodgers goes from here. He could wind up being Farve, 1 and that's it.

[Jack3d]

Can't argue against that. You win this one sir.... But there is no telling where Rodgers goes from here. He could wind up being Farve, 1 and that's it.

True, but given how GB performed with over 20 starters on IR and no run game and Rodgers was still efficient and accurate in his passing, I think he can definitely take them to another one.

[Johan Lofgren]

I was rooting for Sandro but Curran impressed me.