Is *** just a front for a marxist movement?

[RetroSpeed05]

While the core principle of saying *** is fine it seems it became more of a political movement that goes beyond just about ***. Weather it started out that way or not it certainly is becoming something else. Its clever also in a way since people who dont support it are deemed racist because of the *** name people automatically assume you dont support black people instead of the political aspects of the group that have nothing to do with race.

So many big companies and people are being manipulated because they are not informed beyond the the face value of the name ***. Or maybe they are informed about their political standings which is even scarier.

Heres a *** member from the UK flat out saying hes a socialist and his end goal is to over throw the current capitalistic regime. He mentions a Russian revolution style when the communist party took over the country.
Wants no police says the community can police themselves, says Churchhill is a buddy of Hitler, says hes not proud to be British and is a internationalist. And downplays any attacks on cops or rioting.

[Gigantes]

just ask yourself why did they put up a shrine for a guy who pointed a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach, but there was no shrine for a black police veteran who died trying to do the right thing.

why was a black guy who got killed by a white cop life's important but a black guy who got killed by a random guy life's not important

so i'd say yes it's a front

[////]

I don't think it's a single simple phenomenon.

A big part of it is indeed leftist/marxist revolutionary groups using the rage of vulnerable communities to their advantage.

Several KGB defectors discussed how they targeted black & lgbt youth by infiltrating US public school curriculum and referred to it as an intergenerational timebomb. The average American teenager has no idea what the Taiping Rebellion is despite it rivaling the World Wars in scale and historical significance, but they have memorized a series of dubious individual "oppression tales" which depict all of Western civilization as evil via anecdote.

Post-Cold War American history curriculum is quite literally a bullet list of all the worst errors one ethnic group has ever made, and nothing else. Children of that group grow up hating themselves and their peers grow up hating them and when you attempt to reeducate either group by exposing them to international history, they tend to scream or become violent.

Certain parts of the brain especially phobias and a sense of persecution etc are locked in at a young age, so no matter how many times you show people statistics where black people are actually the ones committing the lion's share of interracial violence and everyone else is simply struggling to move away from that violence. all of your progress is lost when the media runs 2-3 cherry-picked clips of a black guy getting hit or shot by a member of another race (just like teacher told us about!) & uses suggestive wording to imply that there's more they aren't showing.

Rest assured, if there was more, then they would replay it 24 hours per day just like the 2-3 clips that they do possess.

However there's also an organic psychological phenomenon where any group lagging behind socioeconomically or experiencing adolescent romantic rejection is going to want to explain it away with oppression. Oppression is the most desirable explanation (think for a moment about what the alternative explanations would be and how difficult they are to cope with).

If the oppression isn't really there then they will find ways to antagonize the groups they share their country with until they create some sort of conflict which can at least be interpreted as oppression. This actually has a the****utic effect because they can look at one of those aforementioned clips, sigh in relief and declare that they have nothing to work on & it's out of their hands; it's just "systematic oppression".

On top of that there are non-Marxist elements. Russia continued to fund & promote "black power" propaganda & events after the Soviet Union collapsed. Groups with radical ***ish origins such as SPLC & ADL tend to use blind black rage as ammunition against other Caucasian groups whom they view as threats to ***ish cultural & financial dominance in the US. China, Iran, etc., which are varying combinations of Marxist-Nationalist-Theological-Corporatist, all stand to profit from internal American chaos. The central authorities of the EU use the bogeyman of "supremacy" to deter member-states from winning their independence, and so they too benefit from stoking US racial tension.

Then there's the corporate vicious cycle. They tend to appease the group they view as most likely to disrupt business with acts of vandalism or terror by issuing statements of alliance/solidarity; but this only grants legitimacy to the extremist movement and brings in more members, obligates rival businesses to join in, etc.

In essence, who isn't behind it?

You have a very small minority of the world: White, Hispanic & Asian Americans who see how America is first-hand and realize something is fishy when the TV shows them walking around randomly beating black men. And most of them don't really care that much and just plan on moving away from the inner city.

So that's one army. 1% of the world and barely any of them even care.

On the other side? The entire rest of the world.

Radical Marxists promote it as a means of accelerating collapse. Foreign countries of every system promote it to retaliate for sanctions. Black Americans themselves use the systematic oppression myth to gain advantages in academia & the work force, psychological leverage over sufferers of white guilt (which they can to extort gullible non-black Americans for money, promotions, ***, legal leniency, etc.) Giant corporations compete with each other over who can most appease rioters and turn them against their competition, and in turn become free advertisement for the movement.

It's just a giant snowball based on nothing but will continue to grow and grow.

[Luilun]

It’s an extortion racket that feeds the DNC

[Gigantes]

"we are trained Marxists"

*** co-founder confirms what anyone who’s read their work knows: they’re proudly marxists.

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi)

Straight from the horse's mouth

[Mighty_Windir]

"we are trained Marxists"

*** co-founder confirms what anyone who’s read their work knows: they’re proudly marxists.

— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi)

Straight from the horse's mouth

Bingo:

[img]//i.postimg.cc/cLQ5JGjw/***.png[/img]

[Gigantes]

Bingo:

[img]//i.postimg.cc/cLQ5JGjw/***.png[/img]

yup, there it is

[4truth]

They're nothing but a small subset of all of the rubes controlled by the media. A better question is does our media have a Marxist influence.

[John Barron]

*** is funded by globoh*mos attempting to usher a one world, big government that would make the USSR blush. the "black lives matter" slogan and under dumb **** they like to chant are effective lures to trap unsuspecting normies into their globoh*mo agenda. because who doesn't want to be a "racist" right? prove you aren't a racist by accepting communism, normies!

[STREET CLEANER]

With trying to mark everything is racist so you can go ahead and say and do what ever you want has worked.

Now they are blaming the entire police departments of the nation as racist so now you have all this nonsense.