What Sort of Dog or Pet Do You Own?

[1bad65]

cats regularly lose to dogs in any objective test of intelligence.

Maybe so, maybe not.

But my point remains; dogs allow themselves to be trained, while cats refuse to.

The biggest partisan shill on the website thinks he's an independent thinker. It's just too much. And you probably think you're smart

Smarter than you, obviously in written English.

And in terms of debate too. After all, I can state my case without insults. You lack that ability.

But maybe you'll learn. Of course I doubt it. Arrogant ******** suffer from Dunning-Kruger all too often, and thus can't learn new things.

You crack me up. You're an arrogant fool who hurls insults at people, then you tell yourself how dumb they are while patting yourself on the e-back.

It's quite sad.

And it's why I typically ignore you.

When, or rather if, you learn to debate like an adult, I'll take you up again. But watching you concede debate after to debate to me, yeah, that got boring real fast.

[New England]

Maybe so, maybe not.

But my point remains; dogs allow themselves to be trained, while cats refuse to.



Smarter than you, obviously in written English.

And in terms of debate too. After all, I can state my case without insults. You lack that ability.

But maybe you'll learn. Of course I doubt it. Arrogant ******** suffer from Dunning-Kruger all too often, and thus can't learn new things.

You crack me up. You're an arrogant fool who hurls insults at people, then you tell yourself how dumb they are while patting yourself on the e-back.

It's quite sad.

And it's why I typically ignore you.

When, or rather if, you learn to debate like an adult, I'll take you up again. But watching you concede debate after to debate to me, yeah, that got boring real fast.

dude you act like posting to you is worth addressing typos or pressing shift to capitalize letters. it is not . act like an adult, bro. this is a debate! you are literally not worth taking a second to right clcik on a word and have it rearranged. no idea why you'd think you are!



is there a single poster on this forum who doesn't read this dude's stuff and recognize a new level of being a loser of which you were unaware?

i mean really, 1bad, your existence is among the most pathetic that i've come around. it really is. you're in your 40's taking L's on politics in a freaking boxing forum. and you have somehow developed these feelings of superiority in spite of the regular thrashing you take and how ****** you're made to look regularly.



do you really need to be reminded of why you initially put me on ignore, that i'd follow you around in every single political thread you started or in which you participated? you did not understand that the constitution protected religious establishement in the US. FFS that's the first line in the bill of rights and you didn't read the thing, or understand its very plain english if you did.

from there on your card was pulled! and yet here you are, acting liek you take W's on this forum and implying that you take them over me. dude you f#cking ignored me and continue to click every post and read it and decide on a case by case basis whether this post or that is worth getting your cheeks hollowed out.

[1bad65]

Since you're one of the biggest e-competers here, I'll ask you the questions i ask others like that (such as SafeSpace)....

How does one "win" on Internet forums???

I hear people like SafeSpace say they do that, but when I ask how it works I get no answers.

So tell us, how does one "win" (or "lose") on Internet forums?

Like how's the contest/game played? How's the scoring system work? Who makes the rules and officiates them? Where are the W-L records, and is there a playoff/belt system for those who "win" the most?

Do tell.....

[siablo14]

dude you act like posting to you is worth addressing typos or pressing shift to capitalize letters. it is not . act like an adult, bro. this is a debate! you are literally not worth taking a second to right clcik on a word and have it rearranged. no idea why you'd think you are!



is there a single poster on this forum who doesn't read this dude's stuff and recognize a new level of being a loser of which you were unaware?

i mean really, 1bad, your existence is among the most pathetic that i've come around. it really is. you're in your 40's taking L's on politics in a freaking boxing forum. and you have somehow developed these feelings of superiority in spite of the regular thrashing you take and how ****** you're made to look regularly.



do you really need to be reminded of why you initially put me on ignore, that i'd follow you around in every single political thread you started or in which you participated? you did not understand that the constitution protected religious establishement in the US. FFS that's the first line in the bill of rights and you didn't read the thing, or understand its very plain english if you did.

from there on your card was pulled! and yet here you are, acting liek you take W's on this forum and implying that you take them over me. dude you f#cking ignored me and continue to click every post and read it and decide on a case by case basis whether this post or that is worth getting your cheeks hollowed out.

He doesn't post about boxing at all. Even when big fights are on he is not in NSB.