Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michael Jackson Stockpiled Gruesome ****ography, Photos Of Animal Torture.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by //// View Post
    The idea of the entire world just colluding to make him look like a perverted psychopath was a little far fetched. He wasn't some controversial political figure targeted by the KGB, he was a pop singer.

    People consciously chose to ignore reality because they liked his music.

    Similar to how many boxing heroes beat the **** out of their family members, and people who feel bad for buying their PPVs just whip out the "his wife and kids probably wanted money, and the judge hates him because he so fresh".
    He owned like 90% of the Beatles catalog, and the powers that be hated that, and wanted it. Millions of reasons to make him look bad.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by R_Walken View Post
      Isn't it illegal to posses child **** and other f.ucked up sh.it like that . I'm sure If he had any of that the powers that be would have charged him or released it to the public when he was alive seems like some bull sh.it to continue to piss on a dead man grave who can't defend himself.
      Exactly......

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by ßringer View Post
        Dude, if you guys could see my search history I'm pretty sure you'd all think I was insane or something.

        ISIS execution videos, bizarre porn videos I've watched for lulz, wikipedia entries on people like Leonard Lake and Peter Scully, death metal music videos, documentaries on "cult of personality" types like David Koresh and Charles Manson, audio files of fucked up events in history like the Jonestown massacre, videos of people being mauled to death by large predatory animals, etc...

        And that's just last week's searches. Who the hell knows what's lurking down that rabbit hole from months or years ago.
        What video did u watching of someone getting mauled by an animal?

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Sterling Archer View Post


          this is really old news.

          there was a thread about this awhile back where someone posted ACTUAL POLICE REPORTS of the crazy amount of child pron that MJ had.

          the police report even showed the ridiculous names of the pron video titles.

          still people defended the man.

          now, its that's not reputable enough website as if the multiple court cases and over $200 million settled isnt enough...

          how about vanity fair? is that credible and mainstream enough for you?

          Newly Surfaced Police Reports Detail Michael Jackson’s Disturbing ****ography Collection
          There were images depicting children’s faces on adult bodies.






          i shouldnt be surprised. these are the same people that defend Islam...
          Well damn, didn't see this yet. Fuggit, I'm gonna go get a burrito from a bomb Mexican place near me. I could care less about his weird ass.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Willy Wanker View Post
            I like your style brother.
            Thanks, man. I swear, I'm totally normal, though.



            What video did u watching of someone getting mauled by an animal?
            More like which ones haven't I watched?

            Google is your friend, bruh. There's dozens and dozens of videos out there of people getting absolutely wrecked by everything from crocodiles and lions to bears and sharks. You just have to look for them.

            The one that came to mind when I made the post was of an Indian farmer being obliterated by a sloth bear though, if that helps.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by ßringer View Post
              I mean, I'm not saying I don't believe it...but it's going to have to be reported on by a website with a higher standard of journalistic integrity than fucking Jezebel for me to take it seriously.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
                This has nothing to do with the story reported in OP's post. It's just an article that recounts the fact that Jackson settled out of court during his 1993 abuse scandal.

                Jackson again went on trial for the same crimes with a new victim in 2003 and was found not guilty.

                Not that settling the '93 case out of court nor acquittal of the '03 case in court has any bearing on whether he was guilty or not. Just mentioning it for the sake of any continuing conversation in the thread that would be quick to bring up either case to suit their argument.

                Neither of them mean **** one way or the other, really. Because the result of each case could be used to cancel out the other depending on which side of the argument you stand on.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Also, on topic : Now that more reputable sites are reporting on it (thanks to Archer for the Vanity Fair link) I plan on following this a bit more closely as more details emerge over the coming days.

                  It's also worth nothing that the police department has responded to these reports with an official statement, per Vanity Fair...

                  Update (June 21, 10:10 A.M.): A representative from the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department gave Vanity Fair the following statement regarding the documents:

                  Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’s Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources. The Sheriff’s Office did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media. The Sheriff’s Office released all of its reports and the photographs as part of the required discovery process to the prosecution and the defense.
                  So, basically - Some of it is legitimate and other parts are being confirmed by the police department as being completely fabricated.

                  Hopefully we can get a further breakdown on which bits are real and which bits are dumb stuff from the internet. (Spoiler alert : Probably the animal sacrifice nonsense.)

                  Comment


                    #39
                    that's what chrome's incognito tab is for.

                    so when you die nobody knows you were into interracial cuckold BBC and pregnant white girls getting bottomed out by bbc.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by ßringer View Post
                      Dude, if you guys could see my search history I'm pretty sure you'd all think I was insane or something.

                      ISIS execution videos, bizarre porn videos I've watched for lulz, wikipedia entries on people like Leonard Lake and Peter Scully, death metal music videos, documentaries on "cult of personality" types like David Koresh and Charles Manson, audio files of fucked up events in history like the Jonestown massacre, videos of people being mauled to death by large predatory animals, etc...

                      And that's just last week's searches. Who the hell knows what's lurking down that rabbit hole from months or years ago.
                      Lmao I spent time on liveleak and also read up on the whole Jonestown(watched the death audio) as well. I get curious af when I smoke some...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP