<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stanley Kubrick vs Martin Scorsese

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Stanley Kubrick vs Martin Scorsese

    The two greatest, IMO. (Hitch**** right there as well)

    STANLEY KUBRICK

    Paths of Glory
    Spartacus
    Lolita
    Dr. Strangelove
    2001: A Space Odyssey
    A Clockwork Orange
    Barry Lyndon
    The Shining
    Full Metal Jacket
    Eyes Wide Shut

    10 Oscar Nominations
    4 Best Director Nominations: Dr Strangelove, Space Odyssey, Clockwork Orange, Barry Lyndon
    6 Best Original/Adapted Screenplay Nominations: Lolita, Strangelove, Space Odyssey, Clockwork Orange, Barry Lyndon, Full Metal Jacket

    Resume not as deep given his inactivity in his later years, but arguably 5-6 classics in there. That's insane. Could also do ANY type of film. Comedy, Sci Fi, War, Horror, Psychological Thriller, Period Drama, etc.

    MARTIN SCORSESE

    Mean Streets
    Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore
    Taxi Driver
    New York, New York
    Raging Bull
    The King of Comedy
    After Hours
    The Color of Money
    The Last Temptation of Christ
    Goodfellas
    Cape Fear
    The Age of Innocence
    Casino
    Kundun
    Bringing Out the Dead
    Gangs of New York
    The Aviator
    The Departed
    Shutter Island
    Hugo
    The Wolf of Wall Street

    Won 1 Oscar
    Best Director: The Departed

    Nominated for 9 Oscars
    7 Best Director Nominations: Raging Bull, Last Temptation, Goodfellas, Gangs of NY, Aviator, Hugo, Wolf of Wall Street
    2 Best Adapted Screenplay Nominations: Goodfellas, Age of Innocence

    Probably the deepest and greatest resume ever, especially in his era. As equally influential as Kubrick (just see Tarantino and PT Anderson today). Arguably 4-5 classics on there, which is also insane.



    Who ya got?
    32
    Stanley Kubrick
    46.88%
    15
    Martin Scorsese
    46.88%
    15
    Too close to call
    6.25%
    2

    The poll is expired.


    #2
    Kubrick.

    Scorsese is fantastic, but none of his works have ever really inspired me to really reflect on my viewing experience afterwards. Kubrick accomplished that for me with many of his films. Particularly 2001.

    Comment


      #3
      Too close to call. I keep thinking one guys better, than I have to re check the other guy's list, and I keep going in circles.

      Comment


        #4
        Would love to see a remake of a clockwork orange

        Edit: not sayng it needs to be remade, just would be interested in seeing a fresh take
        Last edited by ~AK49~; 03-20-2014, 06:08 PM.

        Comment


          #5
          Scorcese probably makes the films I'd watch more, but I have to edge this to Kubrick. I think probably the fact he was such a lazy ***** (Even though you've missed three off, it's stll just thirteen features in 46 years... what an idle ****) helps him. They're not all great, but the P4P ratio is higher... because while any director produces variable works, Kubrick never made anything as crap as Shutter Island.


          Oscars don't mean anything to me, it's just self-serving and Americocentric. When do the likes of Kurosawa, Bergman or Ray win an Oscar for "best picture"?

          In the interest of full disclosure, this is all I've seen of their works:

          Kubrick - 8 out of 13 features seen.
          Scorcese - 18 out of 23 features seen.

          Comment


            #6
            Kubrick. I like Scorcese's early stuff but Kubrick was on a whole other level. Scorcese's movies don't ask questions the way Kubrick's do. I don't think they have anywhere near the same depth to them either, with a few exceptions.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by ~AK49~ View Post
              Would love to see a remake of a clockwork orange

              Edit: not sayng it needs to be remade, just would be interested in seeing a fresh take
              Fun fact......Kubrick was prepping a screenplay for a Dr Strangelove sequel in the 90's and wanted Terry Gilliam to direct, but died before he could complete it.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by !! Anorak View Post
                Scorcese probably makes the films I'd watch more, but I have to edge this to Kubrick. I think probably the fact he was such a lazy ***** (Even though you've missed three off, it's stll just thirteen features in 46 years... what an idle ****) helps him. They're not all great, but the P4P ratio is higher... because while any director produces variable works, Kubrick never made anything as crap as Shutter Island.


                Oscars don't mean anything to me, it's just self-serving and Americocentric. When do the likes of Kurosawa, Bergman or Ray win an Oscar for "best picture"?

                In the interest of full disclosure, this is all I've seen of their works:

                Kubrick - 8 out of 13 features seen.
                Scorcese - 18 out of 23 features seen.
                I don't think Shutter Island was crap, but given the hype going in, and the fact he's previous three films were Gangs of New York, The Aviator, The Departed.....I had astronomical expectations. And it fell wayyyy flat.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Kubrick

                  most of his movies have massive influences throughout history of film. You can argue that he made the best there is in every genre: comedy (Strangelove), horror (The Shining), anti-war (Paths of Glory), Sci-Fi (2001)

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Scorsese makes good stories. Kubrick makes thought provoking stories.

                    I prefer to think rather than just be entertained.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP