AE911Truth Experts Speak Out

[Drunken Cat]

Those who have never watched this video had ought to give it a watch. This is the primary video of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. It is more than 2 hours long and contains a considerable amount of information. Appearances run the gamut from practitioners to academic scientists to former politicians, etc. This is not meant as "another 9/11 thread." This is intended as a thread in which to review and discuss a documentary. Discussion should be based on the topics raised in the film. This is a film which I believe many people will find insightful as well as eye opening. It raises many questions which are to this day without sufficient answers, and it raises legitimate and verifiable su****ions with respect to the received narrative regarding 9/11.

[squealpiggy]

Those who have never watched this video had ought to give it a watch. This is the primary video of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. It is more than 2 hours long and contains a considerable amount of information. Appearances run the gamut from practitioners to academic scientists to former politicians, etc. This is not meant as "another 9/11 thread." This is intended as a thread in which to review and discuss a documentary. Discussion should be based on the topics raised in the film. This is a film which I believe many people will find insightful as well as eye opening. It raises many questions which are to this day without sufficient answers, and it raises legitimate and verifiable su****ions with respect to the received narrative regarding 9/11.

So you're following up your ****** comments about Iranian politics with the ******ity of posting a youtube video about 9/11?

Newsflash: Hardly any of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are actually architects or engineers and those that are represent a tiny lunatic fringe of the worldwide pool of architects and engineers.

The very existence of this group is a fallacious argument from authority which is odd considering how low the entrance requirements are. Hold a bachelor degree in computer engineering? Hey you're qualified to be an authority on architectural engineering!

If there was a scientific basis for the colossally idiotic argument that 9/11 was caused by a controlled demolition then the argument would be made in peer reviewed scientific papers published in technical journals. Not on youtube.

[BetterCallSaul]

Not watching the video because having quickly scanned through it, I didn't hear any questions raised that haven't been sufficiently answered before.

[Drunken Cat]

So you're following up your ****** comments about Iranian politics with the ******ity of posting a youtube video about 9/11?

Newsflash: Hardly any of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are actually architects or engineers and those that are represent a tiny lunatic fringe of the worldwide pool of architects and engineers.

The very existence of this group is a fallacious argument from authority which is odd considering how low the entrance requirements are. Hold a bachelor degree in computer engineering? Hey you're qualified to be an authority on architectural engineering!

If there was a scientific basis for the colossally idiotic argument that 9/11 was caused by a controlled demolition then the argument would be made in peer reviewed scientific papers published in technical journals. Not on youtube.

Nice to hear your overview assessment of the video. Lets keep the discussion moving.

[squealpiggy]

Not watching the video because having quickly scanned through it, I didn't hear any questions raised that haven't been sufficiently answered before.

It's over two hours long! If I was going to sit through a two hour video there are about a dozen Louis Theroux documentaries I could watch, plus I still have Machine Girl and Zombie Apocalypse I haven't had a chance to take out of the wrapper yet!

[Drunken Cat]

Not watching the video because having quickly scanned through it, I didn't hear any questions raised that haven't been sufficiently answered before.

I would seriously have to disagree with the notion that all the questions raised in the video have been sufficiently answered. Not going to twist your arm with respect to watching the video though, your call. I'd hope that people would in fact take the time to watch at least a section of it without just scanning.

[Drunken Cat]

It's over two hours long! If I was going to sit through a two hour video there are about a dozen Louis Theroux documentaries I could watch, plus I still have Machine Girl and Zombie Apocalypse I haven't had a chance to take out of the wrapper yet!

Yes, we all deal with issues of time constraint. The thread is merely suggestive regarding the video, though I do recommend it. It is well worth watching, imho.

[Daniel Alpha]

I am sorry but this is another useless thread about 9/11

[squealpiggy]

I would seriously have to disagree with the notion that all the questions raised in the video have been sufficiently answered. Not going to twist your arm with respect to watching the video though, your call. I'd hope that people would in fact take the time to watch at least a section of it without just scanning.

Which questions raised in the video haven't been sufficiently answered?

Prediction: TS will claim that I would need to watch the full 142 minutes of the video in order to find out which questions haven't been answered and that failure to do so amounts to come sort of moral victory on his part.

There's a reason that 9/11 "truth" liars resort to posting absurdly long videos instead of just making their arguments in writing.

[squealpiggy]

Yes, we all deal with issues of time constraint. The thread is merely suggestive regarding the video, though I do recommend it. It is well worth watching, imho.

Your opinion was that Iranian politics was "extremely like" US politics until I demonstrated how wrong that was.