There is not and never was a single fact to back up that Egyptians were Negroid. That is a black lie that is not taken seriously by anyone that matters.
Have you ever even been to a museum and seen Egyptian artifacts? Those are not black faces...
That's because your concept of what's black is extremely distorted.
There are thousands of Egyptian mummies and none of them are black.
Black Egypt is a terrible lie and an attempt to thieve someone elses history.
If you believe that's true, than explain this citation:
There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa.. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas." (Nancy C. Lovell, " Egyptians, physical anthropology of," in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt, ed. Kathryn A. Bard and Steven Blake Shubert, ( London and New York: Routledge, 1999) pp 328-332)
What are you talking about? Black is Negroid and negroids have certain features that make them distinct.
There is nothing distorted at all. Blacks in the USA are negroid and the ancient Egyptians are not your race.
No they don't. Sub Saharan Africans are the most genetically diverse people on the planet. Most don't even fit into the Negroid morphology, which is why it is not widely used in academia, but the average lay person such as yourself doesn't know it. Your view is based on outdated scholarship.
If you believe that's true, than explain this citation:
There is now a sufficient body of evidence from modern studies of skeletal remains to indicate that the ancient Egyptians, especially southern Egyptians, exhibited physical characteristics that are within the range of variation for ancient and modern indigenous peoples of the Sahara and tropical Africa.. In general, the inhabitants of Upper Egypt and Nubia had the greatest biological affinity to people of the Sahara and more southerly areas." (Nancy C. Lovell, " Egyptians, physical anthropology of," in Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt, ed. Kathryn A. Bard and Steven Blake Shubert, ( London and New York: Routledge, 1999) pp 328-332)
You obviously have no experience with reliable sources and/or citations. Nancy C. Lovell and Steven Blake Shubert are probably the worst "writers" ever. Infact, calling them writers is an insult to REAL writers out there. It is quite easy to look for certain topics/subjects and use other's work and call it your own....plagiarism at its finest.
No they don't. Sub Saharan Africans are the most genetically diverse people on the planet. Most don't even fit into the Negroid morphology, which is why it is not widely used in academia, but the average lay person such as yourself doesn't know it. Your view is based on outdated scholarship.
Go to the source, just ask him where he learned that.
The Ancient Egyptians drew pictures of man. They drew themselves brown and the Nubians black. Then theres the most damning evidence, the bodies. I don't study skulls so I will make no comment on them, but the hair... Its not Nubian hair.
However, we are all human so any achievment of man is an achievment of us all. If China or India puts a man on Mars, thats not an Asian achievment, its all of ours.
You obviously have no experience with reliable sources and/or citations. Nancy C. Lovell and Steven Blake Shubert are probably the worst "writers" ever. Infact, calling them writers is an insult to REAL writers out there. It is quite easy to look for certain topics/subjects and use other's work and call it your own....plagiarism at its finest.
Comment