Why is the Anointed One losing his approval so fast?

[Glamour Puss]

Is that another stab at me, weaksauce? I wasn't defending Bush, just showing that blaming him 100% for our current situation is a bit absurd. I didn't vote for him and I'm not looking for someone like him to replace the current clown, but no one is voting for 90 year old Ron Paul, so get over it already.

Clearly they're not the SAME party. **********s are fighting like hell to keep this Health Care and Cap and Trade monstrosities from passing. They are not nearly as conservative as they need to be, but are still as a whole, clearly better than the alternative. Stick to your usual "Zbigniew Brzezinski is *****'s puppet master" "Don't let them inject you with the H1N1 vaccine!!!!!!" "NAFTA is EVIL" "Unions are wonderful" "9/11 was an inside job" garbage.

Shut up clown.

Bush increased the size of government by leaps and bounds compared to anyone else in history. And that was under a ********** controlled congress.

They didn't seem to mind too much when they had the majority. Now that they don't theres a couple who pretend to have some integrity.

You're a joke for believing them.

As for the bold. Its all true. Its not my fault you're an ignorant fool who watches Glenn Beck.

[Jim Jeffries]

1. ***** is Brzezinski's puppet
2. NAFTA is evil
3. 9-11 was an inside job with some outside assistance

I'd like to see you try to tell me what the hell we got out of NAFTA

For one thing, it employs a ton of people that would instead be coming over here to compete with the 10s of millions already looking for work. For two, it's a non drug injection into Mexico's economy. And for three, provides us with some cheap goods.

1 and 3 I'll leave for people with tinfoil hats to discuss.

[Glamour Puss]

For one thing, it employs a ton of people that would instead be coming over here to compete with the 10s of millions already looking for work. For two, it's a non drug injection into Mexico's economy. And for three, provides us with some cheap goods.

1 and 3 I'll leave for people with tinfoil hats to discuss.

Yeah, it allows multi nationals to forsake any sort of workers rights and go around the world hiring ****** to work for them while at the same time gutting the American economy, labor force and standard of living.

You really are a sick and twisted individual.

No wonder you don't see it. You actually support NAFTA!! LOL...

Al Gore pushed NAFTA dip****, you're in good company.

[Jim Jeffries]

[/B]

Shut up clown.

Bush increased the size of government by leaps and bounds compared to anyone else in history. And that was under a ********** controlled congress.

They didn't seem to mind too much when they had the majority. Now that they don't theres a couple who pretend to have some integrity.

You're a joke for believing them.

As for the bold. Its all true. Its not my fault you're an ignorant fool who watches Glenn Beck.

Bush never had the majority in Congress that ***** has.

The last two years, when things started to get really bad, ********s had taken over the House and Senate.

Yes, Bush made mistakes, including opening the door to this bailout crap. And forcing people to look to the extreme left for their next choice for President. But he was no where near as bad as this current joker, or as bad as the Press made him out to be.

Enlighten me why in every post that you try to discredit me (which is every post,) you mention Glenn Beck? Is that you ace in the hole? That I watch an opinion show for entertainment once or twice a week, automatically makes me an idiot, whose opinion doesn't matter? Try again son.

[Glamour Puss]

Btw Jeffries, you keep referring to the health care takeover as a monstrosity, and you're right.

But where you fail and show utter lack of understanding is that the Massachusetts model dreamed up by Mitt "Willard" Romney is THE EXACT SAME MODEL THAT ***** IS TRYING TO PUSH!!

Forcing people to buy private insurance is a Mitt Romney idea.



There's nothing universal about it, its just a gift to private insurance co's, written for and by private insurance co's.

And idiots like you think its "socialism", lol...

[Glamour Puss]

Bush never had the majority in Congress that ***** has.

The last two years, when things started to get really bad, ********s had taken over the House and Senate.

Who are you kidding? The **********s have had a majority since the 90's, its the only reason the Clinton ******* impeachment even happened.

Yes, Bush made mistakes, including opening the door to this bailout crap. And forcing people to look to the extreme left for their next choice for President. But he was no where near as bad as this current joker, or as bad as the Press made him out to be.

Bush ran nothing. He was a **** president. As bad as *****? Probably not, but not too far off either. Defending him is an exercise in partisan hackery.

Enlighten me why in every post that you try to discredit me (which is every post,) you mention Glenn Beck? Is that you ace in the hole? That I watch an opinion show for entertainment once or twice a week, automatically makes me an idiot, whose opinion doesn't matter? Try again son.

Because you regurgitate all of what he says thats why.

[Jim Jeffries]

Btw Jeffries, you keep referring to the health care takeover as a monstrosity, and you're right.

But where you fail and show utter lack of understanding is that the Massachusetts model dreamed up by Mitt "Willard" Romney is THE EXACT SAME MODEL THAT ***** IS TRYING TO PUSH!!

Forcing people to buy private insurance is a Mitt Romney idea.



There's nothing universal about it, its just a gift to private insurance co's, written for and by private insurance co's.

And idiots like you think its "socialism", lol...

Yes, Mitt Romney made a mistake in Mass, people do, but can't we learn from past mistakes? Carter made a mistake with his "Windfall Profits" tax, that led to shortages, skyrocketing fuel prices, lines around the block. Can't ***** learn from that one as well?

I think *****'s many references to "spreading the wealth around" are socialistic in nature, yes. You on the other hand, say that if you're against unions, you're a *******. Then turn around and call *****, one of the most union friendly presidents ever, a *******. You really don't have a clue.

[Jim Jeffries]

Who are you kidding? The **********s have had a majority since the 90's, its the only reason the Clinton ******* impeachment even happened.

I repeat, Repubs never had the filibuster proof majority that the Dems currently enjoy, hell in 04, the Senate was 50/50. And Dems took over both House and Senate in 06. Seriously man, do some research.

Bush ran nothing. He was a **** president. As bad as *****? Probably not, but not too far off either. Defending him is an exercise in partisan hackery.

Finally we agree on something.

Because you regurgitate all of what he says thats why.

You wouldn't know that unless you watched him at least as much as I do, now would you?

[Glamour Puss]

Yes, Mitt Romney made a mistake in Mass, people do, but can't we learn from past mistakes? Carter made a mistake with his "Windfall Profits" tax, that led to shortages, skyrocketing fuel prices, lines around the block. Can't ***** learn from that one as well?

I think *****'s many references to "spreading the wealth around" are socialistic in nature, yes. You on the other hand, say that if you're against unions, you're a *******. Then turn around and call *****, one of the most union friendly presidents ever, a *******. You really don't have a clue.

He's not friendly to the unions. He's a union buster by trade. Thats what he did in Chicago and thats what he's doing now. Community organizing is a pseudonym for "union busting"..

The UAW was basically bought off and told to shut up when they dismantled the automakers.

The Unions had no choice anyway since GM and Chrysler got sold off to Fiat.

[ƒallenloki]

For one thing, it employs a ton of people that would instead be coming over here to compete with the 10s of millions already looking for work. For two, it's a non drug injection into Mexico's economy. And for three, provides us with some cheap goods.

1 and 3 I'll leave for people with tinfoil hats to discuss.

So it keeps people from coming here to compete for jobs by just shipping them outside of the country instead?

Cheap goods in terms of price, expensive in quality sacrificed and jobs lost.