The second 2023 loss in Supreme Court this year for the current US regime

[15round]

Covid jab mandates damaged the economy by increasing costs due to labor shortages resulting from mandates. The Supreme Court ruled against them in January. Supposedly the regime said by getting jabbed it would reduce absenteeism, but the effect actually increased absenteeism because people who did not want to get jabbed quit their jobs.

Now they ruled against student loan forgiveness. In theory those who were educated should have been able to find a job that would pay back the loan. What sense does it make to fund those people? Apparently it made sense to the regime.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Covid jab mandates damaged the economy by increasing costs due to labor shortages resulting from mandates. The Supreme Court ruled against them in January. Supposedly the regime said by getting jabbed it would reduce absenteeism, but the effect actually increased absenteeism because people who did not want to get jabbed quit their jobs.

Now they ruled against student loan forgiveness. In theory those who were educated should have been able to find a job that would pay back the loan. What sense does it make to fund those people? Apparently it made sense to the regime.

Another good ruling! If you agree to pay it back, you pay it back.

[15round]

Exactly. The education helped them get a job to do that.

[markusmod]

Exactly. The education helped them get a job to do that.

I second this.