Omicron now

[Ben Bolt]

As of Dec 11 ... 114 Danes with triple-shots being infected by omikron ... Keep distance!

[Citizen Koba]

Anyways. I'm done for the eve. Ended up missing half the Ekaterinburg fights for this, and besides ain't good for my mood. Hope you don't take any of this personal mlac, I genuinely think you're a good dude trying to make sense of a complex set of circumstances that's being muddied by the amount of conflicting information around.

[Split Decision]

you still ain't said what it is you believe is going on... I'm struggling to know how to address your concerns because I still ain't heard from you precisely what you think

u won't ever hear it either lol

both u and robbie have asked him numerous times but he knows it will weaken his position lmao

[man down]

No it doesn't. Why? You make make the best use of the tools you have available. You don't just not test because your test ain't perfect. From the collective public health perspective even a reasonably accurate testing system is far better than no system at all. And PCR tests are generally pretty good when performed correctly, lateral flow tests far less so, but still much better than nothing when applying the precautionary principle. Same way even a vacine that 80 or even 50% effective is far far better than no vaccine at all.

And yes, possibly there has been at the very least some corner cutting by vaccine developers given the speed of devlopment. i woulda guessed that even before the whistleblower at the Texan research contractor for Pfizer disclosed their negligence and poor practice there. regardless that wouldn't have showed anything which wouldn't have already become apprent during rollout and we now have an a vast volume of the most scrutinised data in history of how the vaccines work in the real world and their safety. Basically we no longer need to rely on the pharmaceutical companies becasue the outcomes of the vaccination campaign around the world are in the public domain. The original trials data has been supsceded and surpasedd and rendered all but redundant at this point. One way or another we - the vaccinated - have been the proof of relative safety and efficacy. Still. Like I say. I do believe that it should be everyone's choice.

And no, that is not a logical chain of deduction... and it's not even much of an assumption. Is it possible? yes. Is it the most likely possibility. for an overarching explanation of how the COVID response has been handled? Absolutely not. I've refered Hanlon before, now perhaps it's time for Occam's razor... fewest assumptions, man. You could equally justifiably assume - and with a vast anmount more evidence - that the pandemic response is more or less exactly what it appears to be. Textbook infectious disease response strategy which has been more or less used with few varaitions around the globe, same as it has been used for more localised outbreaks of diseases in the past.. Of course both the vaccine companies and Governments have opportunistically sought to use this crisis to make the most money possible (and slip through some nasty legislation whilst they're at it) but that in no way constitutes evidence that either the pandemic their response ain't what it seems to be.

Maybe the vaccine companies are crooks, but that doesn't mean that vaccines ain't the best way to minimise death and hospitalisation from COVID and aren't the most rational and effective public health measure to pursue. You understand? One doesn't follow from the other.


But man you still ain't said what it is you believe is going on... I'm struggling to know how to address your concerns because I still ain't heard from you precisely what you think the situation is? Do you think COVID itself is fake? Or that the Government response from nations around the world ain't what an 'honest' Government would have done? Some kinda depopulation plan? A simple cash grab con job on an unprecedented scale? I really ain't sure what you're alleging. It'd be easier to deconstruct if you were a little more specific.

PCR tests are good? Musk, James and many more had false tests.

Then the FDA pulled the tests because of false outcomes. Why you spreading misinformation?

[man down]

Lol when the omicron first came out they tried to say it would make it past natural infection. Why is it 95% of the cases are in the vaxxed?

[man down]

Harvard study, Vax is useless.

[Ben Bolt]

Harvard study, Vax is useless.

Sweden … 74 per cent of those now hospitalized at intensiv care, are unvaccinated.

The unvaccinated at intensiv care have an average age of 56, compared to 71 for those
who have been vaccinated.

Reportedly, those who have been vaccinated but still become infected, have far less
severe symptoms than those unvaccinated.

[mlac]

Sweden … 74 per cent of those now hospitalized at intensiv care, are unvaccinated.

The unvaccinated at intensiv care have an average age of 56, compared to 71 for those
who have been vaccinated.

Reportedly, those who have been vaccinated but still become infected, have far less
severe symptoms than those unvaccinated.

i saw some statistics and graphs and scary looking figures, therefore they must be true & i will now argue these statistics as undisputable facts to bolster the wider narrative.
low level thinking bud.

[man down]

Sweden … 74 per cent of those now hospitalized at intensiv care, are unvaccinated.

The unvaccinated at intensiv care have an average age of 56, compared to 71 for those
who have been vaccinated.

Reportedly, those who have been vaccinated but still become infected, have far less
severe symptoms than those unvaccinated.

Harvard and Canada are wrong? This isn't my opinion, it's their studies.

[Ben Bolt]

Harvard study, Vax is useless.

Harvard and Canada are wrong? This isn't my opinion, it's their studies.

I don’t know how the talks in Canada are going, but if it’s about the Harvard University, I refer to its homepage: