Also that Flawless fool with another pearler.. "Uruguay better than Argentina".. hmm I think not.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Football Soccer Football Soccer Football Soccer
Collapse
-
Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Postfalcao has great positioning. i think that is bigger than his actual heading ability.
drogba could have the shytiest positioning and still get a header in the net.
ur a city fan, so i don't expect you to respect greatness of a rival.
It has nothing to do with Chelsea being another English club, Drogba could play for City and he'd still be leagues behind Falcao when it comes to aerial ability.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RichCCFC View PostWhere's those ****ing idiots who said Adam Johnson was better? shows only 2-3 people know anything about football in this thread. That's why I never bothered with it, full of foreigners who think they know something about football.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squealpiggy View PostI'm not aware of anyone who said that.
You actually commented on it back when it circled and Johnson was still a Man City player, you said Bale was the better of the two.
I'll find it if I can be arsed but it was that Flawless idiot and that fool from South AmericaLast edited by RichCCFC; 10-13-2012, 09:16 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Flawless* View PostHe wouldn't make the Madrid squad at all, he offers nothing. Adam Johnson is a better player than Bale and would relegate Bale to the reservesOriginally posted by Flabulous View PostCan't see how he is trolling? He's telling the truth. Bale is vastly overrated.Originally posted by Flabulous View PostNo, they really wouldn't. One good game in twenty.
Newcastle had a right back playing at left back (Ryan Taylor) and Bale did nothing all game.
33 shots 4 goals. 1 single assist. Plays for every minute of every game. Terrible.
Johnson has played 1 full 90 minutes and has the better stats!Originally posted by Flabulous View PostJohnson = Dribbling, Technique, Vision
Bale = Fast
Originally posted by Flawless* View PostYou cannot compare Greece's fluke run in 2004 to Uruguay today. Greece did nothing after 2004. While Uruguay after 2010, followed it up by winning the second biggest Continental tournament in the world. Uruguay played better against the Dutch than the Brazilians did. Uruguay played against Germany than Argentina did. There is no question who is the best South American team in the world now, Argentina and Brazil live on their legacy not their performances,
Again, people fear Brazil and Argentina on what they have accomplished. There is a aura surrounding these two teams since they have produced the greatest players of all time. However, as a team they are not better than Uruguay. You are basing your argument on history, as a team they are not that good.
Example, most teams would say they rather play England than Japan. But Japan is the better International teamOriginally posted by Flawless* View PostPlease, how are we to measure teams if we don't evaluate their last performances. You are basing Brazil/Argentina to be the better team based on team sheet, football doesn't work that way.
The last time Brazil has impressed was the 2005 confederation cup and last time Argentina impressed with 2006 world cup. While the weaker team now Uruguay has outperformed both teams in the World Cup and Copa. I don't see the sense in your argument
Again, your comparison are whack yet again. Chelsea was completely outplayed by Bayern and Barcelona, while Uruguay played well in all their Copa and World Cup match. Unlike the Final, Uruguay won 3-0 and Chelsea scored with one shot and won on penalties. There is no comparison here
So what Argentina's squad is stacked? They failed miserably at the World Cup and Copa which was hosted in their home country. They have Messi, so what? Suarez and Forlan are better international players and produced the goods at International stage,
Comment
-
-
-
falcao is listed at 48m sterling.... i can guess only one epl team willing to burn that cash in january.
Comment
Comment