I am a neutral and I think they had a strong case for a penalty. Maybe 2.
Nasri was unlucky. Hit crossbar bounced straight down and out.
Gibson's goal took a heavy deflection and would not have hit the back of the net otherwise.
you cannot make comments purely on looking at just the results.
Lol what?? U watched it right? I can't think of a chance other then the 35-40 yrd shot from nasri. Face it they look poor.. Barely sc****d by Wigan and spurs.. Lost to Sunderland, utd, Liverpool and everton
Aguero isnt firing.. Dzeko apart from a goal vs Wigan has been woeful
They better pray toure gets knocked out of the cup soon
Lol what?? U watched it right? I can't think of a chance other then the 35-40 yrd shot from nasri. Face it they look poor.. Barely sc****d by Wigan and spurs.. Lost to Sunderland, utd, Liverpool and everton
Aguero isnt firing.. Dzeko apart from a goal vs Wigan has been woeful
They better pray toure gets knocked out of the cup soon
Yes I watched it. I watched united highlights too. neither played well. man utd won with 2 penalties. Man city lost to a deflected goal. bit of bad luck I would say but Man utd play crap and still win. it is what champions are able to do.
Better hope so, other than offloading players and selling merch, they can't really do much.
While Chelsea on the other hand, most of the wages come before 2010. So they write that off, then can still invest in building a new stadium, which means Uefa will overlook their losses.
Chelsea is in good standing even with a supposed 78 million in losses. City on the other hand.....
Comment