There's this funny notion here that gay people are gay because they have "sick morals" (and that's a direct quote). "Sick morals" implies that the reason hetero***ual men don't stick their penises into other men is not because they don't find the notion ***ually arousing, it is because they have some sort of higher moral code than *******uals.
In other words anybody who suggests that gay people have "sick morals" is suggesting that they refrain from *******ual behaviour for moral reasons even though it's something they would really like to do.
I myself refrain from engaging in *******ual activities because I'm not *******ual. It doesn't take any moral fortitude whatsoever. It would take moral fortitude to avoid, say, cheating on my wife with another woman or something. But just as it wouldn't take any sort of moral effort on my part to avoid sticking my junk in a blender it would not take any moral effort to say "No ta." to a **** up the jacksie.
Can you understand now how ludicrous it is to decry the morality of gay people? Can you?
In other words anybody who suggests that gay people have "sick morals" is suggesting that they refrain from *******ual behaviour for moral reasons even though it's something they would really like to do.
I myself refrain from engaging in *******ual activities because I'm not *******ual. It doesn't take any moral fortitude whatsoever. It would take moral fortitude to avoid, say, cheating on my wife with another woman or something. But just as it wouldn't take any sort of moral effort on my part to avoid sticking my junk in a blender it would not take any moral effort to say "No ta." to a **** up the jacksie.
Can you understand now how ludicrous it is to decry the morality of gay people? Can you?
Comment