Gay people

[omarinbox]

****s are ****s. I ain't lynching em I ain't hating on them. Let them enjoy their life.

Its not like they are a majority, or ever will be.

I figure this cos every girl I have been with has to be coerced into ****.

[squealpiggy]

****s are ****s. I ain't lynching em I ain't hating on them. Let them enjoy their life.

Its not like they are a majority, or ever will be.

I figure this cos every girl I have been with has to be coerced into ****.

This is a healthy attitude.

[TheAuthority]

"Freedom Fighter" eh ? Irony ?

Freedom for all ...(except *******uals).

[TheJoker]

"Freedom Fighter" eh ? Irony ?

Freedom for all ...(except *******uals).

Of course, that would infringe upon his freedom of prejudice.

[dr.x]

Believing in evolution is like believing in gravity.

off course evolution does exist .scientifically speaking , biologic and social factors play a role in *******uality.but social factor play most of the role as there is a low concordance rate between ****zygous twins . this mean that genetic does not play the major role in *******uality . but since there is a genetic factor , this must be , as you said, evolutionary . but it still must be treated like any genetic disorder,and have to develope treatment for it. we have thousands of genetic diseases , that are the product of evolution , and *******uality must be treated as one of them, it shouldn't be treated as normal habit in my opinion , its a disorder and was regarded by scientists as so.
for now, the genes that are involved are unidentified , mostly there are multiple genes .
and therapy to change ***ual behavior has been tried but was unsuccessful, in the contrary , it aggravated the low self-esteem .

[squealpiggy]

his mean that genetic does not play the major role in *******uality . but since there is a genetic factor , this must be , as you said, evolutionary . but it still must be treated like any genetic disorder,and have to develope treatment for it. we have thousands of genetic diseases , that are the product of evolution , and *******uality must be treated as one of them

Why? I've never seen this adequately explained.

[omarinbox]

Why? I've never seen this adequately explained.

Cos its some serious **** eugenics based ****. It doesn't need to make sense. Thats just the way the pure Aryan people are....

[squealpiggy]

Cos its some serious **** eugenics based ****. It doesn't need to make sense. Thats just the way the pure Aryan people are....

It certainly seems to be precisely the same argument.

Substitute "*******ual" for "black" or "criminal" or "gypsy" or "***" and you essentially have, at a risk of invoking the wrath of Godwin, a **** Final Solution.

[AKATheMack]

I don't really think that's a proper comparison.

Both parts agree to the ***ual encounter, whereas children and animals are forced to be victims of traumatizing events which most likely will scar them for life.

Can't compare someone participating voluntarily and someone being forced to perform.
It's wrong.

The only difference is that there is a possibility of finding a willing *******ual partner while you cant find a willing horse. Are men in control of their ***ual preferences? Do people choose to be gay? Do people choose to be attracted to kids? I'd say it most certainly is comparable. All scenarios listed involve odd ***ual practices does it make gay men more moral than a man attracted to children just because its legal?

[squealpiggy]

Gay rights, women's rights, children's rights are all human rights.

Hence my passion for the subject.