The only difference is that there is a possibility of finding a willing *******ual partner while you cant find a willing horse. Are men in control of their ***ual preferences? Do people choose to be gay? Do people choose to be attracted to kids? I'd say it most certainly is comparable. All scenarios listed involve odd ***ual practices does it make gay men more moral than a man attracted to children just because its legal?
Consenting adults and children are very different. I wouldn't let a child bear arms and neither would I let them loose on ***, drugs or rock n roll.
Consenting adults and children are very different. I wouldn't let a child bear arms and neither would I let them loose on ***, drugs or rock n roll.
Look at Hanson and the Jonas Brother ffs
Im not advocating molseting children nor am I degrading *******uals. Im simply asking if people choose their ***ual preferences, if not then how can we judge their moral character?
I think people do choose but I'd guess morality in terms of *** is based on the respect you have for your partner and the kind of relationship you have.
I stopped running around increasing my ***** count when I figured that. Looked for, and found, my one.
Thats why civil partnerships should be encouraged in my eyes as it gives a goal of commitment for gays and such.
Then again theres plenty married straight folks that have no respect for their partner.
Something doubly bizarre about gay rights is that people will say things like "*******uals have higher rates of STDs and are more promiscuous than straight people!" and then you ask them if they're all for gay marriage as a monogamous legal commitment and they say "Er... no... that would be redefining marriage!!!!!!"
Comment