Official Joe *****-****** Harris Presidency Thread

[JimRaynor]

Ok let me try it this way because I think you're still focusing on party, not ideology.

Who would have a better chance of being elected governor of Massachusetts. ***** or Hillary?

Who the hell knows and who cares, these are pointless questions that have been diverted from the original post you made about the impossibility of making inroads with a voting block that goes 60-30 ********** which is a ridiculous thing to say. Meanwhile the Hispanic voting bloc that swings the opposite way is constantly being made inroads with the **********s.

It was a racist tweet posted by a white cuck of a ******* that held very little weight. A tweet that attracts other racists. Lets see what the voting pattern of that "uneducated" white male were in places like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio in 2008 and 2012 not just the country as a whole. Lets also picture if someone made a tweet that said the black voting bloc has been going 90% for ********s for the past 50 years, why are we even trying to make inroads with them? That would've atleast made more sense to say, but then that persons career wouldve been over.

[bigjavi973]

Bwahahahahahahaha

What is going on? I’m really confused and I feel like I’m losing my mind

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar)

The only reason they put him in the race was because Bernie was leading in the polls. But ***** is who ********s believe the white working class will vote for (they're wrong). He's from that 3rd way Clinton era. That era is gone.

da fuq

his teeth falling out

him forgetting what he said in the debate

and now the infamous Corn Pop

[bigjavi973]

Yeah. i am rolling with Elizabeth Warren.

for real?

why even bother?

Tulsi is a much much better candidate

[bigjavi973]

We will see.

Money bet?

Ill bet you 1k cash ( I have pay pal) that warren does not win any type of election

[1bad65]

Ill bet you 1k cash ( I have pay pal) that warren does not win any type of election

You better be very, very careful.

Wagering money online with a stranger is risky, and you're challenging a guy to a bet who has never ever admitted he was wrong.

I'm not seeing any possible payoff for you.


You know what they say about a fool and his money.....

[bigjavi973]

Nine out of 10 African-Americans surveyed on the eve of the election said they were voting or had already voted early for a ******** in the congressional races, up from 77 percent who said so in July, according to the survey by the African American Research Collaborative. And while a number of GOP candidates distanced themselves from their party's controversial leader or just tried to ignore him, polling showed ***** might as well have been on the ballot himself, the survey indicated.

Nearly 8 in 10 African-Americans said ***** made them "angry," while 85 percent of black women and 81 percent of black men said ***** made them feel "disrespected," according to the study. Similar majorities of African-American voters – 89 percent of women and 83 percent of men – said *****'s statements and policies will cause "a major setback to racial progress."

[bigjavi973]

You better be very, very careful.

Wagering money online with a stranger is risky, and you're challenging a guy to a bet who has never ever admitted he was wrong.

I'm not seeing any possible payoff for you.


You know what they say about a fool and his money.....

the only way I would do it is pay up or a ban bet


so if he doesnt pay he has to leave the site

[1bad65]

Giving them good jobs wont get their votes, but calling them "******" will.

It's amazing, isn't it.

[1bad65]

the only way I would do it is pay up or a ban bet


so if he doesnt pay he has to leave the site

Ah, no wiggle room. So no bet on his end then.

As you saw with me, these superfans dont have the faith to make straight-up bets on their hero Pocahontas.


They can spew mad trash talk, but when comes to a wager they shut up fast.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Romney is closer to Hillary. No question about it. He is a buttoned down, political class guy who is guided by political strategist and handlers. He, like Hillary, is representative of the Washington status quo. He is a minimalist, place holder, interventionist, shill.. I could go on and on.
I'd say ***** is still shilling for Israel way too hard but with the pull out of Syria, I think that sent a strong message.
Hillary and Romney, for whatever reason, would have been Israel's b*tch; neck deep in Syria and Iran ground war.
Hillary and Romney also would never have instigated a trade war with China. Like I said. They are place holders.

This is the answer above. You don't understand the difference between ideology and party.

Romney is closer in ideology to Hillary than *****. So if only 4% separates someone as far apart in ideology as ***** & Romney you aren't making inroads in that group.

Who the hell knows and who cares, these are pointless questions that have been diverted from the original post you made about the impossibility of making inroads with a voting block that goes 60-30 ********** which is a ridiculous thing to say. Meanwhile the Hispanic voting bloc that swings the opposite way is constantly being made inroads with the **********s.

It was a racist tweet posted by a white cuck of a ******* that held very little weight. A tweet that attracts other racists. Lets see what the voting pattern of that "uneducated" white male were in places like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio in 2008 and 2012 not just the country as a whole. Lets also picture if someone made a tweet that said the black voting bloc has been going 90% for ********s for the past 50 years, why are we even trying to make inroads with them? That would've atleast made more sense to say, but then that persons career wouldve been over.