911 was set up by the goverment!! There is proof everywhere!

[75th]

i've seen several videos and have read numerous stuff on all the evidence about 911 and im almost 100% sure that this devastating tragedy was set up by our own goverment for numerous reasons. It really is sad when you think about it and the blame the government puts on arab countries to solidify a war on "terror" against eastern countries in order to control the oil. Anyways here is a great website if any of ya'll are interested in reading on all the un-answered questions the government fails to acknowledge.

here is two clips from the site. the first one is the actual and ONLY video the government released from the pentagon crash. They claim a "747" hit the building but no one is buying it and they wont release video to back up their claim.
this is the actual video
[IMG]//i349.***********.com/albums/q366/newchamptony/e-pentagon_animation.gif[/IMG]

and this is what it would look like if a 747 really would hit the pentagon
[IMG]//i349.***********.com/albums/q366/newchamptony/pentstrike3.gif[/IMG]

alot of interesting facts, questions, and very respectable theories on this site if you're interested

After your countless hours of painstaking labor, I'd say your research proves that you're a total ****ing idiot, but you surpass that title.

You're the worlds dumbest man. Cong****, *******.

[abadger]

What I am unable to understand is the hatred that the truthists get in this thread. Remeber guys, doubting the government of America is not the same as doubting America. it just means you think Bush and his cronies are venal, backstabbing crooks and murderers, which in fairness they probably are.

[Dynamite Kid]

.................

[unbanrogelio128]

Moot point because all of the evidence that points to a government conspiracy is simply made up.

There's evidence of incompetence on the part of the government but none whatsoever that points towards malice.

experts and att spokesman on the "calls" mad from flight 93
Any analysis of the cellphone and “airfone” calls from Flight 93 must begin with some basic, high-altitude cellphone facts. According to AT&T spokesperson Alexa Graf, cellphones are not designed for calls from the high altitudes at which most airliners normally operate. It was, in her opinion, a “fluke” that so many calls reached their destinations. In the opinion of a colleague of mine who has worked in the cellphone industry, it was a “miracle” that any of the calls got through from altitude. (See the recent proposal to install equipment to make cellphone calls possible from aircraft.) An aircraft, having a metal skin and fuselage, acts like a Faraday cage, tending to block or attenuate electromagnetic radiation. One can make a cellphone call from inside an aircraft while on the ground because the weakened signal is still close enough to the nearest cellsite (relay tower) to get picked up. Once above 10,000 feet, however, calls rarely get through, if ever.

Here is the statement of an experienced airline pilot: “The idea of being able to use a cellphone while flying is completely impractical. Once through about 10,000 feet, the thing is useless, since you are too high and moving too fast (and thus changing cells too rapidly) for the phone to provide a signal.” (AVWeb, 1999)

[unbanrogelio128]

I tried to resist commenting but I just couldn't.



They did? When? And who? And in which peer reviewed scientific journal was this "proof" published?



And what should the government be addressing? Considering your theory is "The guvvermint dun it" in what manner should it be addressed? Vote in congress? Public enquiry? **** Cheney taking them on a hunting trip?



Does this entire sentence become completely worthless if I point out that the aircraft in question was a 757, not a 747?



I was playing jenga yesterday and the ****ing tower fell over. I still claim that I won as it is physically impossible for the wooden jenga blocks to melt purely from the heat of the friction so it must have been a controlled demolition.



Two planes crashed into the towers?



Since when does "adjacent to" equate to "nowhere near"?



Who do? The scientists?



The government know that the moon is made of cheese. It must be true because I said it. Many people also know this to be true which is evidence that it is true and also the government deny it.



The government addressed it when they held an inquiry.



OK here I'm just going to out and out call you a liar. The onus is on you to provide evidence.



Does controlled demolition melt steel? You absolutely have to answer this question. If you answer "no" then you're admitting that steel doesn't need to melt to cause the collapse of a building. If you answer "yes" then you are making the outrageous claim that demolition causes the melting of steel and you would be required to back that up. Good luck with that.



bin Laden is a multi millionaire from a family of billionaires. Money doesn't mean much to him. As for his freedom... he's already free!



Did you notice that there were no vampire shadows anywhere in the WTC attack? This is proof that vampires did it as everyone knows that vampires cast no shadows.

You dozy ****.

I will counter all your ****** replies and make you look foolish when i get home from work.

[½ Man ½ Amazing]

Where would the CIA be without Bin Laden...

[!! Shawn]

What I am unable to understand is the hatred that the truthists get in this thread. Remeber guys, doubting the government of America is not the same as doubting America. it just means you think Bush and his cronies are venal, backstabbing crooks and murderers, which in fairness they probably are.

It has absolutely nothing to do with doubting the government and everything to do with the fact that these clowns, and yes they are clowns, ignore every bit of factual evidence in favor of fairytale made-up facts.

[!! Shawn]

I will counter all your ****** replies and make you look foolish when i get home from work.

I can't wait to see this. Its quite near impossible to make someone look ****** when you are basing your arguments on non-existent evidence.

[unbanrogelio128]

it Has Absolutely Nothing To Do With Doubting The Government And Everything To Do With The Fact That These Clowns, And Yes They Are Clowns, Ignore Every Bit Of Factual Evidence In Favor Of Fairytale Made-up Facts.

Made Up Facts?????? These Facts Are Made Up??? There Is Dozens And Dozens Of Un-answered Questions The Government Will Not Address Why? The Fact Is A Jetliner Hit The Pentagon Right? Where's The Video??????? fact: No Steel Building In The History Of The World Has Ever Collapsed Due To Fire, Especially Jet Fuel That Burns At Half Of The Maximum Temperature Needed To Melt Steel... That My Friend Is A Fact! I Can List And Link Several Collisions Into High Rise Buildings Where The Buildings Were On Fire For Hours Hours, One Almost 24 Hours Burning In Jetfuel And Didnt Come Close To Collapsing. Yet These 3 Buildings Burned For 56 Min And The Heat Was Too Much For The Steel

[unbanrogelio128]

i Can't Wait To See This. Its Quite Near Impossible To Make Someone Look ****** When You Are Basing Your Arguments On Non-existent Evidence.

Funny You Say Non-existing Evidence....are You Reffering To The Plane The Hit The Pentagon??? Where's The Evidence? Why Are They Hiding The Tape? Your A Moron. There Is Several Real Questions About What Happened And People Like You Think It's Impossible The Government Can Do Something Like That.