Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: Joshua Just Sh-t Himself Live On TV; I'll Knock Him Out Inside 3 Rounds!

[thetruthteller]

Fury couldn't KO Wallin.
Fury took steroids
Fury has 0 title defenses
Don't believe anything he says

[Tecnoworld]

Fury is so much better than aj. He can win in several different ways.

[Oregonian]

IDK I still think Wilder has a good chance. Call me thick headed.

0-1-1

Could of been 1-1 I thought fury was out. He rose back from the dead...

——?br />
Where was that good chance in the 2nd fight?
That was the fight to show why he thinks he win the 1st fight.
That was the fight to prove he just had an of night.

[Tecnoworld]

Because a gypsy would never use crackstreams

Best post ever

[Oregonian]

These are the words -- verbatim -- that came out of Joshua's mouth:

"If that is Tyson Fury, let it be Tyson Fury. It’s no big deal."

Those are the words. I think they're clear.

——-

But it is Tyson Fury so why the semantics?
It’s the only fight everyone wants so why not say it straight up?

[deathofaclown]

Fury is a deep thinker whereas Femi is a simple boy.

The clock is ticking, Fury is about to give AJ a masterclass and show him what this game is really about.

That's if AJ doesn't s*** himself and run off to fight another old man.

They were probably hoping Wach was going to beat Hughie tonight, then line him up for AJ.

Ticks all the boxes. 40 year old guy that lost to Wlad and were at their best in the Wlad era.

[Winky-Wright]

I wonder if Fury will be eating his wild boar meat in prep if they end up fighting.

[Oregonian]

Fury couldn't KO Wallin.
Fury took steroids
Fury has 0 title defenses
Don't believe anything he says

——?

And yet he beat Wilder. Twice

[NYG]

Fury beats AJ. Learn the sport kids

[Monty Fisto]

——-

But it is Tyson Fury so why the semantics?
It’s the only fight everyone wants so why not say it straight up?

Because he's not there to pay homage to Fury by saying he's the only game in town, especially when there is precedence of Fury's flakiness.

He said he'd fight whomever held the title. Nothing's changed there -- he's had a long-stated aim of holding all the belts at once. If it's Tyson, no biggie.

If he says: Tyson's the only fight I want, the only one of any importance, what's the upside? If Tyson fights a Seferi-type nobody again or takes the Wilder rematch or falls out of the sport again, then necessarily Joshua has to fight someone who isn't Fury and then he gets bashed for saying the Fury fight was the only one worth making.