<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao was never Lineal at welterweight, stop the bs

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    Pacquiao was never Lineal at welterweight, stop the bs

    Pacquiao LOST to Floyd, the Lineal champion. Floyd retired. Pacquiao never beat the consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight while he was #1 or #2. Tim Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2. Stop with the bull****. Pacquiao is an amazing ATG that accomplished a lot. But he was NEVER Lineal at welterweight. He still could end up Lineal though.
    Tags: None
    #2

    Comment

      #3
      he will never be as good as baldomir

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        he will never be as good as baldomir
        Judah was Undisputed and Lineal at welterweight. It doesn't mean Zab or Baldomir were necessarily better than Manny or could beat him but they were actually Lineal, unlike Manny.

        Comment

          #5
          Manny became the Lineal Welterweight because he won it vs Bradley.

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
            Manny became the Lineal Welterweight because he won it vs Bradley.
            False. Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight. Keith Thurman was ranked higher.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
              False. Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight. Keith Thurman was ranked higher.
              Nah, here's why. "Pacquiao and Bradley entered the bout rated as the top two welterweights by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board and ESPN (though not Ring ****zine"
              //krikya360.com/manny-pa...rilogy--103294

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                Nah, here's why. "Pacquiao and Bradley entered the bout rated as the top two welterweights by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board and ESPN (though not Ring ****zine"
                //krikya360.com/manny-pa...rilogy--103294
                So they weren't the consensus #1 and #2... thanks for making my point

                Comment

                  #9
                  Yeah i don’t get it either. Bradley fought less difficult and non seasoned Welterweights to be considered highs than Thurman. Keith got rid of Diego Chaves while Bradley was playing around with Chavez along with Brandon Rios....

                  Thurman for years always wanted the Floyd and PAC fight. He was notorious in interviews that he deserved the shot with Pac or Floyd. The WBA Regular since Chaves must have meant something...

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                    Pacquiao LOST to Floyd, the Lineal champion. Floyd retired. Pacquiao never beat the consensus #1 or #2 at welterweight while he was #1 or #2. Tim Bradley was never consensus #1 or #2. Stop with the bull****. Pacquiao is an amazing ATG that accomplished a lot. But he was NEVER Lineal at welterweight. He still could end up Lineal though.
                    explore it yourself

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP